Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

synergie

(1,901 posts)

22. I guess that's why the GOP is so eager to prevent any actual investigation into the machines?

Reply to Chernobyl (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 8, 2017, 04:39 AM

Jan 2017

Actually, people have been wondering, especially when the machines in Detroit and certain counties in WI were not investigated.

Shall the class explain to you that when you are denied an investigation, that it's a bit difficult to come up with details?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many votes for Trump were more of a vote *FOR* Clinton? [View all] LaydeeBug Jan 2017 OP

What? scscholar Jan 2017 #1

How many got switched. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #2

If there was proof of our actual voting machines or voting system was hacked in any way Chernobyl Jan 2017 #4

And no one will ever admit the machines have been tampered with. dflprincess Jan 2017 #5

When you say things like this you disrespect every Dem poll watcher and election Chernobyl Jan 2017 #6

How does a poll watcher or election judge know that a paperless machine has not been hacked dflprincess Jan 2017 #7

Poll watchers and election judges can't determine whether the option pnwmom Jan 2017 #24

You place great faith in humanity's inerrant and unfailing ability LanternWaste Jan 2017 #32

That is emotionalist kenfrequed Jan 2017 #34

You are CORRECT! The first electronic hack occured in 2000 - Volusia County, FL ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #8

Well put! triron Jan 2017 #18

One of those myths that cannot be challenged. Well said. eom guillaumeb Jan 2017 #30

Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer to that mythology Jan 2017 #15

Who is this "nobody" you are referring to? triron Jan 2017 #16

I said nobody has indicated that Russia (or anyone else for that matter) in any way Chernobyl Jan 2017 #19

An analysis (by Ron Baiman, Ph. D.) of the exit poll data vs triron Jan 2017 #20

What are your thoughts on Trump being blackmailed by Russia because of pee video? uppityperson Jan 2017 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #28

No, you've got that wrong uppityperson Jan 2017 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #36

I guess that's why the GOP is so eager to prevent any actual investigation into the machines? synergie Jan 2017 #22

I'm sure if you opened up those voting machines you'll find the algorithm AgadorSparticus Jan 2017 #3

Is incrementing by one really an algorithm? scscholar Jan 2017 #9

Yes. Not every vote will be counted the same. So not every x vote will y vote. AgadorSparticus Jan 2017 #21

Great question! True_Blue Jan 2017 #10

While I appreciate your attempt to marginalize the issue LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #11

I agree with you True_Blue Jan 2017 #12

That's how he got them to believe it LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #13

True True_Blue Jan 2017 #14

Some flipping of votes may have indeed occurred but that probably triron Jan 2017 #17

And shutting down polling sites. LisaM Jan 2017 #26

Starting rumors for the sake of spreading fake news is not productive mtnsnake Jan 2017 #23

+1. Just saw Elliot Richardson. He said we had to quit talking about allegations as fact. Hoyt Jan 2017 #27

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #29

I see some of them triron Jan 2017 #33

many tens of thousands of Clinton votes just weren't count triron Jan 2017 #35