Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dhpgetsit

(1,917 posts)
24. From 2002 but still entirely appropriate:
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 10:32 PM
Dec 2013

"What's really wrong, though, are these indictments of populism. The DLCers have got political history backward. The original populists were not out to destroy capitalism but to preserve it."

"But there was a defining populist worldview that has influenced Democrats from Bryan in 1896 to Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 to Clinton and Gore in 1992. At the heart of this worldview was what the populists called "producerism." The Jacksonians, and later the populists, distinguished those who actually produced wealth from those who lived off of it -- "the idle holders of idle capital," as Bryan referred to them in his "Cross of Gold" speech. Populists believed that wealth and power should accrue to those who produced it -- "the people," properly so-called -- and not to those who lived off the people's labor."

"Such a distinction may sound Marxist, but the populists were neither Marxists nor socialists. They counted the craftsman and the businessman as members of the producing classes, but not the speculator or the absentee landlord. Many populists owned their own farms, and they saw an alliance with labor as an alliance between "capital and labor." "Capital and labor should be allies and not enemies," the Farmers Alliance, the founding populist organization, declared in 1885."

Why Democrats must be populists

I believe there is plenty of support for a true populist candidate.

"'okay, this seems to be starting to get out of hand.'" Fuck Third Way. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #1
and, help me remember, did they disclose their donors? Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #4
Don't know about now, but they were supposed to have closed their doors when the Koch $s dried up. freshwest Dec 2013 #9
my brain's all fuddled but didn't Sen. Warren request they voluntarily disclose Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #11
Not sure, time to google the DU... be back. freshwest Dec 2013 #13
lazy me... I think I got it backwards.. she was asking Wall Street to disclose. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #14
I googled and gave you some information. On asking the previously reported 'defunct' DLC? freshwest Dec 2013 #15
Thanks! It seems not only on DU. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #16
True. Bogeyman live forever... n/t freshwest Dec 2013 #17
She's all uppity. Hell Hath No Fury Dec 2013 #5
Yeah, anything that threatens their ability to whore for corporations is "out of hand." polichick Dec 2013 #21
Fuck the Third Way indeed. djean111 Dec 2013 #2
+1,723 Scuba Dec 2013 #10
"I knew I should taken that left toin at Al-ba-koi-kee." freshwest Dec 2013 #3
There you go. If in doubt, always turn left. n/t A Simple Game Dec 2013 #6
As if the Third Ways plan is popular Pakid Dec 2013 #7
"You have to wonder just what kind of people would screw millions of other people out of there SS... jtuck004 Dec 2013 #8
I have to say, these Quislings irritate me more than any teabagger. QuestForSense Dec 2013 #12
We need to know which politicians The Third Way sponsors. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #18
Here's some for you (but not all of course) NorthCarolina Dec 2013 #19
Thank you. What is your source? I have been to their website but rhett o rick Dec 2013 #20
Click "About Us" at top of page then click "Board of Trustees" from the menu. SunSeeker Dec 2013 #22
I should have included the link NorthCarolina Dec 2013 #23
From 2002 but still entirely appropriate: dhpgetsit Dec 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»TPM: Third Way Co-Founde...»Reply #24