Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
27. More reliable sources do exist...
Sat Jun 14, 2014, 12:09 PM
Jun 2014
NYT Debunks Theory That Dem Voters Cost Cantor His Primary

After House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's (R-VA) shocking loss in Tuesday's primary, his pollster attributed the defeat to Democrats voting against Cantor in the primary in order to give their party's nominee a better chance in the general election.

While some Democratic voters did vote in the Republican primary, the New York Times' Nate Cohn wrote that based on the data, Democrats did not significantly contribute to Cantor's defeat.

In more Democratic districts, there was higher turnout in Tuesday's primary than there was for Ken Cucinelli, the GOP gubernatorial candidate in 2013. However, turnout was even higher in Republican precincts, and Brat carried the precincts won by Cucinelli in 2013 with 56 percent of the vote, according to the Times.

"But it would be hard to argue that Democrats made up the margin of victory. Turnout was still far, far higher in Republican precincts. Democratic areas did not contribute a large number of votes: Only 5,722 votes were cast in precincts where Mr. Cuccinelli failed to eclipse 40 percent of the vote. Mr. Brat won by 7,212 votes over all," Cohn wrote.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025083108


and

Democrats didn't sink Cantor
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/11/did-democratic-votes-doom-eric-cantor/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Democrats crossing over has been disproven as the reason why Cantor lost... n/t hlthe2b Jun 2014 #1
Disproven? savalez Jun 2014 #5
Duh. Of course that is what the pollster wants everyone to believe hlthe2b Jun 2014 #6
Oh, I did do some reading. savalez Jun 2014 #10
That you would believe the excuse offered by the pollster? REALLY? hlthe2b Jun 2014 #16
Maybe you missed this part of my post. savalez Jun 2014 #19
There was no significant crossover. former9thward Jun 2014 #22
Posted on DailyKos today: savalez Jun 2014 #29
Maybe but I doubt it. former9thward Jun 2014 #31
More reliable sources do exist... DonViejo Jun 2014 #27
Posted on DailyKos today: savalez Jun 2014 #30
Cantor's people are all over the place. They are blaming everything. First it was fraud. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2014 #32
If true, what's the bad part? TheCowsCameHome Jun 2014 #2
That district customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #3
Brat is indeed 'worse' than Cantor, but as a junior member, he will not Nay Jun 2014 #7
I'd be really surprised customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #8
I'll be pleasantly surprised if Brat loses, too. But Dem leaders have a horrible Nay Jun 2014 #13
I've heard the same thing. Folks are also donating nirvana555 Jun 2014 #4
They Have An Open Primary? billhicks76 Jun 2014 #9
Virginia does have an open primary Brother Buzz Jun 2014 #11
Confused billhicks76 Jun 2014 #12
Didn't, they do now Brother Buzz Jun 2014 #14
The Dems DO have a candidate (Trammel), but they nominated him last Nay Jun 2014 #15
We Should've Targeted Cantor!!!! billhicks76 Jun 2014 #17
Of course we should have, esp when the last challenger polled 40%. It Nay Jun 2014 #18
DLC billhicks76 Jun 2014 #23
the very same democrats who we are all worried wont vote in the gen election in 2014? La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2014 #20
That has been disproven. former9thward Jun 2014 #21
Source? Lil Missy Jun 2014 #24
It's quite possible IMHO. sendero Jun 2014 #25
Whether is was Democrats or not Turbineguy Jun 2014 #26
Already debunked even though I originally thought the same. RandySF Jun 2014 #28
Dailykos thought so too but then this happened savalez Jun 2014 #33
His conclusion doesn't match yours FBaggins Jun 2014 #34
What's my conclusion? savalez Jun 2014 #35
Apologies... should have said "the conclusion of the OP" n/t FBaggins Jun 2014 #36
This is going to be interesting. savalez Jun 2014 #38
Everyone is guessing. There is no proof either way, but I tend to agree that it was Democrats. stevenleser Jun 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cantor was defeated by De...»Reply #27