Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)

8. 60 votes will be found.

Reply to jberryhill (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 5, 2014, 04:03 PM

Nov 2014

A handful of dems will come forth to join in the "compromising".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The REAL pity in all this is that it is so obvious that everyone here at DU agrees that [View all] world wide wally Nov 2014 OP

Not true. shenmue Nov 2014 #1

And that's what makes us Democrats! jberryhill Nov 2014 #4

OK then... Were the voting machines all rigged? world wide wally Nov 2014 #2

Probably most of them. I still think it likely that the Republicans never ever voted honestly. Cal33 Nov 2014 #30

The assumption there is... jberryhill Nov 2014 #3

The major tangible impacts sharp_stick Nov 2014 #7

Judicial appointments is one I had thought of jberryhill Nov 2014 #9

60 votes will be found. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #8

Yeah, and after what we have been through for the duration of the Obama Presidency silvershadow Nov 2014 #29

What you haven't considered is that the first order of business for McConnell will be to world wide wally Nov 2014 #10

Here's the thing jberryhill Nov 2014 #13

Who's "we all" doing that agreeing? MADem Nov 2014 #5

Oui oui, MADem jberryhill Nov 2014 #11

OK. Let's look at the Dems that flaunted Obama's accomplishments and see what happened wit them: world wide wally Nov 2014 #14

Well, yes, I can. No one in the MA delegation campaigned against Obama. MADem Nov 2014 #17

See what I mean? world wide wally Nov 2014 #19

MA is a safely liberal state. And Martha, who brought an Obama in, lost. MADem Nov 2014 #20

So explain Domina's loss in Nebraska Recursion Nov 2014 #22

Have you ever been to Nebraska? world wide wally Nov 2014 #26

I have, in fact. And I support a 50-state strategy, which involves running candidates who can win Recursion Nov 2014 #27

our leadership will take this as a cue to move further right, Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #6

Every time either side loses, that's the rationalization Awsi Dooger Nov 2014 #12

And "who" was giving him these "poor reviews" but never mentioning anything "poor" world wide wally Nov 2014 #31

Just MO timesup Nov 2014 #15

this started in 2009 when Democrats wanted to respond agressively calling out the GOPers Bill USA Nov 2014 #16

No question that Obama laid the groundwork with his "kid gloves - work with Republican" foolishness, world wide wally Nov 2014 #18

Umm... I don't think "everyone" here agrees with that Recursion Nov 2014 #21

So, you think we ran our campaigns the right way? world wide wally Nov 2014 #24

I certainly don't think people lost for being "insufficiently liberal" Recursion Nov 2014 #25

Look at the referendums around the country. Raising minimum wage, paid leave, marijuana...etc world wide wally Nov 2014 #28

Democrats not sticking together? Whats new? Thrill Nov 2014 #23

It is NOT obvious because DU continues to shit on this president, day in and day out. Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #32

No no ... that motivates people to GOTV!!! JoePhilly Nov 2014 #33

Oh, yes. Silly me. I should know better. Congrats to you in PA, by the way! :) Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #34

Sadly, I live in NC now. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #35

Well, we Marylanders are still in shock! Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #36

I hear ya. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #37

I don't agree... brooklynite Nov 2014 #38