2016 Postmortem

Romeo.lima333

(1,127 posts)

20. well now we're talking 2 different things. im talking polls and youre talkling feelings

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 11:22 AM

Mar 2015

The issues democrats care about are better fulfilled by either Warren or Sanders probably but we cant count on dems to vote and if you put up sanders the whole election will be SOCIALIST sanders blah blah blah. warren will be labeled LIBERAL which will motivate the right and they'll be out enmass cause THEY vote. however that isnt what i was taliking about

here are some actuall numbers

New York Democratic Presidential Primary Clinton 51, Warren 11, Biden 8, Cuomo 7, Sanders 5, O'Malley 1, Webb 1 Clinton +40
Wednesday, March 18

CNN/Opinion Research Clinton 62, Warren 10, Biden 15, Sanders 3, Webb 1, O'Malley 1

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

i dont get how someone can disagree with actual numbers

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please Help Me, I Don't Understand [View all] QuestionAlways Mar 2015 OP

Heh. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #1

It is her fault. She orchestrated it. marym625 Mar 2015 #2

had not seen this one. Thank you for it. guillaumeb Mar 2015 #26

what if Mrs Clinton officially says she will run & she is backed by every great D, Obama, Biden, War Sunlei Mar 2015 #3

This is one democrat that won't back her. Splinter Cell Mar 2015 #5

why is someone who is willing to sabotage the democratic election allowed on a democratic board? Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #8

If she doesn't excite democrats enough in the primary Fearless Mar 2015 #13

she has a 54% favorability she excites more than anyone else. what i was refering to are people Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #14

Favorably over a Republican does not equal votes. Fearless Mar 2015 #16

favorable over warren and sanders not just republicans Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #17

I disagree. Fearless Mar 2015 #19

well now we're talking 2 different things. im talking polls and youre talkling feelings Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #20

I'm talking about voter turn out. Fearless Mar 2015 #21

maybe you are now but i was talking about polls and you replied to a post about polls now Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #22

Why do you ask leading questions? demwing Mar 2015 #23

see post 5 Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #25

I'll vote demwing Mar 2015 #27

from the tos . Vote for Democrats. Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #28

I am absolutely not in violation of the TOS, which you appear to have skimmed, not read demwing Mar 2015 #30

well then you WILL support her if she's the dems candidate b/c to do otherwise would be a tos Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #31

It doesn't apply to ANYONE demwing Mar 2015 #33

the tos doesnt apply to anyone? averagejoe90 just got ppr'd over tos apparently it applied to him Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #34

No not the whole TOS you picker of nits demwing Mar 2015 #35

So, you'll vote for Ted Cruz if he's the Republican candidate? hamsterjill Mar 2015 #9

republicans 'cancel' another D vote. Lets hope -if- Mrs. Clinton primaries, it's at least similar Sunlei Mar 2015 #11

hillary has been around so long that people already have the only opinioon theyre gonna have Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #29

I don't particularly like Hillary either, but I would vote for her against any Republican. One Cal33 Mar 2015 #18

she's not left enough for some therefore she's not good enough for them - Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #4

That's not it at all. Splinter Cell Mar 2015 #6

you just said the same thing - she's not left enough Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #7

Do you REALLY believe there is/would be no policy differences ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #10

She could just not run. That's what we need. Fearless Mar 2015 #12

I say the same thing about republicans Cosmocat Mar 2015 #15

I guess this horse just isn't dead enough. CTyankee Mar 2015 #24

A troubling conversation NHDEMFORLIFE Mar 2015 #32