Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
6. Glass-Steagell was passed in 1932 to divide the investment bankers from deposit banks. It was
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jul 2015

repealed in 1999 during the Clinton administration. And yes it may have been veto-proof but I would have much preferred that he would have made then override the veto.

As to reinstating it - this would once again divide the banks up. Not make them smaller but protect deposits. The deposit banks would be covered by FDIC funds like it used to be and the money we put into the bank would only be loaned out on a local basis for homes, cars and school loans. So it would protect the little people and stimulate the local economy.

On the other hand the investment bankers who engage in risky loans etc. will no longer be covered by FDIC - the risk will be their own and taxpayers will not have to pay for their loses. They will still have the right to invest in any way they want but they do not have our money to gamble with.

I think we should be able to get this through the Senate if we all get behind it but the House is another question. With so many Rs in the House we most likely will not be able to turn them away from their Wall Street backers. We will have to hope that we can pass this after we get a Democratic president.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and I predict that no matter who is President, they will not be able to bring back Glass-Steagall still_one Jul 2015 #1
Um, Hillary is all for financial regulation, even... JaneyVee Jul 2015 #2
Glass-Steagell was passed in 1932 to divide the investment bankers from deposit banks. It was jwirr Jul 2015 #6
. Motown_Johnny Jul 2015 #15
Already called my congress persons. jwirr Jul 2015 #3
This is a big one Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2015 #4
Bernie already owns the demographic that is all aflutter about Glass Steagall. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #5
That seems to be a rather specific issue to base a campaign on. Maedhros Jul 2015 #8
I am all for restoring Glass Steagall DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #9
I work for a major national bank. Maedhros Jul 2015 #13
Definitely a major issue for this voter. mmonk Jul 2015 #14
They care about the financial collapse Motown_Johnny Jul 2015 #19
I have had casual conversations with people through the years... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #21
I didn't say that anyone's hair was on fire Motown_Johnny Jul 2015 #22
Meh, I think you're projecting your own biases into what you're seeing. Maedhros Jul 2015 #26
This will come up in the debates Motown_Johnny Jul 2015 #16
I am not so sure that this will be enough, sadoldgirl Jul 2015 #7
Martin O'Malley wants it back. From last month on the 80th anniversary of Glass-Steagall passing: FSogol Jul 2015 #10
from March bigtree Jul 2015 #18
+1. Good op-ed. n/t FSogol Jul 2015 #20
R & K!! RiverLover Jul 2015 #11
It's a pretty well-established pattern. LWolf Jul 2015 #12
And let's go one more step and try and get it done NOW JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #17
You don't have to hint at it. Shout O'Malley from the rooftops. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #23
YAAAAYYY!!! elleng Jul 2015 #25
I HOPE DU realizes that there is more than 1 candidate strongly in favor. elleng Jul 2015 #24
2 words: Raine1967 Jul 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bring back Glass-Steagall...»Reply #6