2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Lets be clear about Bernie vs Hillary [View all]Violet_Crumble
(36,379 posts)And if you go back and read my first post you'll see I mentioned that hosts can block for any reason. While hosts can block DUers for petty reasons like having a personal dislike of someone, DUers can also voice their opinion on those sort of tactics being used by group hosts.
If by 'hard time' you mean daring to reply to someone you like and not agree with them 110% on a topic that wasn't Hillary Clinton, then yes, but by that yardstick everyone at DU would be giving everyone else a 'hard time'. As it had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton that's a weak excuse to justify blocking someone from the group who'd only posted positive stuff there. Like I said, I wasn't aware when I posted a positive OP about Hillary Clinton in the group that to remain a member I wasn't allowed to disagree civilly with certain other DUers on any topic they spoke on. There's no way I'd want to be a member of a group that places restrictions on who DUers can reply to in GD and barring them from disagreeing with a few chosen DUers on any topic at all, nor of a group where one of the hosts uses their position to unilaterally block DUers they don't like. Each to their own, though. I'm sure that sort of thing appeals to a few people somewhere