Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks. Jefferson23 Jul 2015 #1
I'm suprised it's not higher Hydra Jul 2015 #2
More RW talking points at DU to deflect from the economic progress made ....did someone forget to close the Trojan Gate? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #3
At the peak of the recession U 6 was 17.1!!! DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #4
SO if the right mentions it that means we can't discuss it even if it's a valid point? madfloridian Jul 2015 #6
It's only valid when you actually explain the U6 numbers... Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #11
"Saying the REAL unemployment rate is above 10% is shocking because we've been conditioned..." madfloridian Jul 2015 #13
He didn't talk about it honestly, tho. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #15
I vowed to not get negative. madfloridian Jul 2015 #16
Am I supposed to be scared? Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #18
The unemployed who are no longer listed on rolls...betcha they believe it's true. madfloridian Jul 2015 #21
He absolutely is being dishonest. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #40
Are you scared? Of what? madfloridian Jul 2015 #65
It's pretty clear he mislead... Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #68
He spoke the truth. He is NOT right wing. I am NOT right wing. That is disgusting. madfloridian Jul 2015 #70
LOL no he didn't... Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #73
please do not let them get to you questionseverything Jul 2015 #59
Nothing I or any Bernie supporter posted through the years matters now. madfloridian Jul 2015 #62
Are 10% of workers unemployed or not? As just a person, not some mathematician who sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #48
It means they have a motive when they "the right" make it news. Agschmid Jul 2015 #27
The question was how many PEOPLE are actually out of work. That's all people care about. The Left sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #49
Excellent observation. The fact is.... George II Jul 2015 #7
Better shut up, Bernie. It doesn't matter what you say.... madfloridian Jul 2015 #8
To the 6% who many cannot even collect welfare what difference does 9%-6% mean? Stargazer99 Jul 2015 #54
It means that the 3% did NOT lose their homes, cars, healthcare, etc.... George II Jul 2015 #55
It means 3% is OK? Stargazer99 Jul 2015 #56
Is that the bottom line? YES, the 3% is okay, but we haven't stopped working because of that... George II Jul 2015 #57
then, damn it, if they can't received unempoyment-give them something to live on Stargazer99 Jul 2015 #76
That last sentence is exactly why Bernie Sanders is gaining on the front runner. sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #22
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2015 #72
In other words...."I just got a 10% raise and a 15% bonus" does NOT mean the economy is booming! George II Jul 2015 #77
They didn't just question, they went a bit wack over it. SoapBox Jul 2015 #5
Sorry, but Bernie is also manipulating numbers. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #9
I know, shame on him. Right?? madfloridian Jul 2015 #10
Well wages are higher than they were a few years ago. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #12
Drunken Irishman just made a great point about historical U6 Cali_Democrat Jul 2015 #14
Oh, I have responses. Oh yes, many. madfloridian Jul 2015 #17
What resolution? Cali_Democrat Jul 2015 #19
..... madfloridian Jul 2015 #20
All the other DUer did was point out some very simple historical facts about U6 Cali_Democrat Jul 2015 #24
Back at you LeftOfWest Jul 2015 #69
Funny, when Bush was president we had no problem pointing out the FACT the in the US sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #23
It changed when along came Bernie. madfloridian Jul 2015 #25
And this is why he has been so successful so far, because people do not feel they are just a sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #26
I was going to post just this. stillwaiting Jul 2015 #28
Yes, I remember it well. We were outraged that they were 'fudging the numbers' to try to make Bush sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #29
Only the people who did not know the difference I am sure. But I can guarantee this, Darb Jul 2015 #30
Exactly. If Bernie wants to debate which metric to use that's fine. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #32
Bernie talks about PEOPLE. He doesn't talk about 'metrics' whatever that means. And that is why he sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #43
He absolutely DID talk about a metric. UE is a MERTIC. Geeze. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #52
Are 10% of Americans unemployed or not, this isn't a difficult thing to understand sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #58
Is 10% a HIGH number or a LOW number when one looks at the HISTORIC values of this metric? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #60
UE3 is fudging the numbers? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #33
Oh yes there was a BIG change. Autumn Jul 2015 #35
By fact you mean bullshit lie, right? whatthehey Jul 2015 #36
Did you just call me a liar for stating a FACT which from your profile you would not sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #44
To help you, I will bold the bullshit lie I refuted from your post whatthehey Jul 2015 #46
You are now doubling down on calling another DUer a liar, and adding that it is 'intentional' sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #47
Wow, such vitriol from someone who is so completely wrong. tritsofme Jul 2015 #67
Everyone had a problem talking about the U6 numbers. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #41
Unemployed people are unemployed people and this isn't a political football to kick around. You are sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #45
LOL it is a political football to kick around and that's what the right and Bernie are doing. Drunken Irishman Jul 2015 #64
Stop it with your facts!!! JoePhilly Jul 2015 #53
You are incorrect. U3 unemployment is not based at all on receipt of unemployment benefits. tritsofme Jul 2015 #66
Great response. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #34
U6 is a government number. jeff47 Jul 2015 #38
And THAT is shameful isn't it? That in one of the richest countries in the world, jobs are being sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #50
What's the trend look like and how does it correlate with the traditional measure? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #31
No, the RW likes to use U6 during Democratic administrations, and U3 during Republican admins. (nt) jeff47 Jul 2015 #39
So he means U6, measured and published for decades along with U3 whatthehey Jul 2015 #37
Oh look ibegurpard Jul 2015 #42
The figures back Bernie up...he's still called a liar. And I am attacked for posting the figures. madfloridian Jul 2015 #51
This is false U5 and U6 Down year over year!!!! uponit7771 Jul 2015 #75
Bernie failed to mention that the "real unemployment rate" (u6) has been dropping dramatically.. DCBob Jul 2015 #61
+1!!! ****DING DING DING***** Same bullshit in 2000 IMHO uponit7771 Jul 2015 #74
Kick! FloriTexan Jul 2015 #63
***U5 and U6 rate both down*** if Bernie is hinting at Obama's recover then he's no fuckin better... uponit7771 Jul 2015 #71
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CNBC and Bureau of Labor ...»Reply #34