Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Is Hillary a Shill for Monsato? [View all]Babel_17
(5,400 posts)20. Civil Eats raises an interesting point
So what did Nye learn at Monsanto headquarters that changed his mind? In a recent interview with the Huffington Post, Nye said that he does not believe genetically engineered crops are inherently bad. To the contrary, he said he now believes that they have been beneficial to agriculture.
To illustrate his point, he explained that GMO crops put the herbicides and pesticide inside the plant, rather than spraying it on them and having it run down into streams.
In the case of herbicides, Nye is simply incorrect, and its an important error to point out.
http://civileats.com/2015/06/03/what-bill-nye-got-wrong-in-his-about-face-on-gmos/
More Herbicides, Not Less
GMO herbicide-resistant crops are made to withstand the spraying of herbicides, primarily glyphosate (or Roundup), in quantities that would otherwise kill them. GMO Bt crops, on the other hand, are engineered to produce an insecticidal toxin within the plant. Rather than decreasing toxic pesticides in streams, the former products contribute to their presence. Glyphosate is now widely detected in our countrys water, according to government scientists. And recently, a major, independent body of scientists determined that glyphosate is probably carcinogenic, raising the stakes.
I wanted to love GMO's, but Monsanto earned a reputation as a fickle lover, at best.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that is why we need a president who will not put foxes in the henhouses. The Obama admin was
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#30
Are unicorns shilling for real horses? Weighty questions. We should ask a Strawman.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#4