2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: When you give a 19 minute floor speech about going to war, it can not be called a mistake. [View all]BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)that is exactly what our system is and has been increasingly for decades. Hillary is not the first to put political ambition and calculation over the good of the country and the value of hundreds of thousands of lives. Voting for Hillary is the same lesser-of-evils "choice" that we have every time. There are very few on the political scene who have the integrity and the guts to take principled positions.
Politicians like Obama want us to believe that there is a long game where the eventual ends justify the means of further catering to the 0.1% Maybe, but we see something completely different with Warren and Sanders.
And here is the point that we must remember always. The only reason Warren and Sanders can survive taking these positions is because the American public STRONGLY favors those positions. And I'm not talking 60/40 or even 55/45. On most of the issues, poll after poll shows support for the progressive position at 75%, 80%, sometimes even 90%.
The aristocracy may be able to keep one of their own (Hillary) in charge this time, but each passing year with such a divergence of interest between the 0.1% and the rest of us puts us that much closer to revolution. The 0.1% cannot maintain this stranglehold forever.