2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders no longer links lack of orgasm with cancer, right? [View all]BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I wouldn't personally attack you? Where did I attack you? WTF?
This swift boat tactic? For YEARS on this site there has been a constant parade of false claims against Clinton. There is currently an OP falsely and completely distorting her comments on Iran. The false claims about her campaign finance circulate constantly. Some even rev up shit on Benghazi. Ben-fucking-Ghazi. No right-wing source or argument goes unturned in hunting up dirt on Hillary. Now Sanders happens to have written a stupid article ages ago. I don't believe it matters, but calling discussion of it swiftboating and pretending there is something unprecedented about it is unreal.
This is not the HRC group so if someone has called a Sanders supporter a name, I'm sure it will be hidden. They always are, even in the group. However, my guess is it is as much of an insult as my post was a personal attack on you. I don't even know you except for a thread or two where you clearly got upset and wouldn't explain why or how, except I realized in retrospect it was because I wasn't sufficiently reverential to Sanders and suggested that citizens actually have a right to ask questions of their candidates. God forbid. You certainly bashed me in that thread, yet you refused to engage with the substance of the thread at all. That is how I know you. As for what you say in the Sanders group, I have no idea. I have the group in the trash. I don't much care what is said there. Not my group, not my business.
Why even come after me about hosting HRC? I'm not a host of anything.