Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Please stop telling me I'm voting for Sanders because I'm a purist who wants a pony. [View all]Nitram
(27,658 posts)140. If I dodn't know better, TM99, I'd think you took great pleasure in dumping on...
...the democratic candidates for president that aren't your first choice. You obviously aren't someone who understands the spirit of the concept.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Please stop telling me I'm voting for Sanders because I'm a purist who wants a pony. [View all]
mmonk
Jul 2015
OP
Show me in the record where Hillary supported allowing derivatives to be unregulated...
Sancho
Jul 2015
#34
Given that you said this: "If Hillary Clinton gets the nomination I'll support her "
randys1
Jul 2015
#102
Break the 'To Big To Fail' and finish the job by imprisoning the criminals running them.
-none
Jul 2015
#58
The thing is, even if we had to change the whole world, I'd still want to vote for Bernie.
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#80
Why do we have to? The reason for breaking up the banks is so that they can no longer gamble
jwirr
Jul 2015
#68
That is my point. Glass-Steagell did not allow that. But Hillary does not want to reinstate it. No
jwirr
Jul 2015
#93
Unfortunately. One of my professors in college warned our class that Glass-Steagell was the
jwirr
Jul 2015
#113
But if commercial banks and investment banks like Goldman were separate they would be doing
jwirr
Jul 2015
#132
I think where you and I are disagreeing is that you are talking about the world investment
jwirr
Jul 2015
#149
We won't have to insure the losses of banks in all those countries if the banks are
JDPriestly
Jul 2015
#176
And if we have a healthy America the whole world is better off because our investers will not be
jwirr
Jul 2015
#179
I don't have any problem with leveling the playing field with VAT's or import taxes.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#123
Defeating the TPP would put the world's financial markets on notice that the American
JDPriestly
Jul 2015
#173
What is fucked up is our own Congress has passed laws that REQUIRE anyone living abroad
davidpdx
Jul 2015
#91
No, no, no, can't break up the banks. Now, let me invite you to partake of some of our
jtuck004
Jul 2015
#95
Breaking up the big US banks and not allowing them to gamble, to trade, with
JDPriestly
Jul 2015
#171
I think if you read the proposal, it would affect large public retirement funds.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#40
I couldn't find Bernie's latest proposal, but here's a previous similar bill introduced in congress.
DanTex
Jul 2015
#51
link..if state colleges benefited from tuition payment, why exempt them from an FTT?
Sancho
Jul 2015
#55
His proposed tax rate is 50 cents per $100 traded. That is a pretty tiny rate.
peacebird
Jul 2015
#28
Exactly, and I had assumed it did exclude retirement funds.... Guess I need to research that.
peacebird
Jul 2015
#75
Purists who want ponies are the ones who will sit out the GE if the primary doesn't go their way.
DanTex
Jul 2015
#7
Maybe that's your definition, but many others suggest electing Bernie is wanting ponies.
Dawgs
Jul 2015
#24
If I dodn't know better, TM99, I'd think you took great pleasure in dumping on...
Nitram
Jul 2015
#140
And oh wow, you'd bring down the wrath. But you are missing something. I will always
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#167
this wing of the party openly called people who want it Greedy Geezers and say we have
MisterP
Jul 2015
#117
Purist? I wouldnt call you that at all because supporting Bernie is 100% ok just like
cstanleytech
Jul 2015
#23
Bernie fans are setting new records for use of logical fallacies. I've had to go to the fallacy ref
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#72
From my perspective, there are many reasons why Hillary is unfit for the Presidency.
Maedhros
Jul 2015
#105
Sorry, us lefties are voting for Bernie because we and those we love cannot afford almond milk.
jwirr
Jul 2015
#85
Gee, yesterday it was about "stop telling me I will vote for Hillary because I am a woman"
still_one
Jul 2015
#84
Well, you know, you can count on one or more OPs telling us very sternly that we better
djean111
Jul 2015
#96
I have no doubt. I am waiting for the one on Donald Trump though. I really love this Kabuki show
still_one
Jul 2015
#97
Oooh! You reminded me! I have not seen a "Say Hello to President Trump!" as yet.
djean111
Jul 2015
#98
Notice that the "pony" argument always comes from the right side of the target candidate?
arcane1
Jul 2015
#135
With all due respect, it wouldn't be so rough around here if some Bernie fans DID "ask for these
calimary
Jul 2015
#141
Hillary represents everything that is wrong with Wall Street... she is an opportunist, it will
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#164
I'm voting for Sanders because I want single payer healthcare and expanded Social Security.
PatrickforO
Jul 2015
#165