Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Spends 0 on Polling, Hillary Spends $900k. Bernie Doesn't Need Polling [View all]zappaman
(20,627 posts)107. Of course not.
The OP just made that up.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Spends 0 on Polling, Hillary Spends $900k. Bernie Doesn't Need Polling [View all]
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
OP
One person's "manipulative and controlling" is another person's "responsive to my concerns and
MADem
Jul 2015
#51
No--it's about targeting the message to the audience, and there's nothing wrong with that.
MADem
Jul 2015
#69
That is true--people who talk and talk and talk about what they see as "wrong," but who have no path
MADem
Jul 2015
#84
Sen Sanders has been saying the same message over and over for years. It doesn't matter
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#152
If "it doesn't matter to him who his audience is" then he'll have trouble in the big wide world.
MADem
Jul 2015
#153
If your "truth" is "guns are good" and "the F-35 is a swell airplane" then YES, it DOES matter. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#164
But Vermont IS homogenous. I think you'd do well to pull the string on the conversation.
MADem
Jul 2015
#176
Sorry, can't do that. There's always a way, but it's often a difficult path. And the older one
MADem
Jul 2015
#184
Don't ask questions that can't be answered, then. That kind of repartee is terribly lame.
MADem
Jul 2015
#188
Exactly right they use polls to measure positive and negative responses to their message.
A Simple Game
Jul 2015
#18
I find it stupefying how a Hillary Clinton supporter would dismiss social media
davidpdx
Jul 2015
#173
I wasn't "mocking social media." I was mocking the POV that it's the be-all and end-all, and
MADem
Jul 2015
#185
You think an elected representative has no need to know what Americans think? (nt)
Recursion
Jul 2015
#7
Yes but they might not win. Polling is about winning. When polls showed supporting same-sex marriage
PoliticAverse
Jul 2015
#44
That's a shame. It was the right thing to do but polls caused them not to it. Too bad
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#179
Candidates, when elected, represent 100% if their constituency, not just those who voted...
George II
Jul 2015
#60
Hillary doesn't need polls. She's got her orders from this country's Overloads and will..
BlueJazz
Jul 2015
#10
they actually require the polling to make the case for how messages are crafted
nashville_brook
Jul 2015
#132
Because he doesn't have to stick his finger in the wind to know where he stands?
99Forever
Jul 2015
#14
I think he knows Vermont-type people very well, but beyond that, I dont think so.
DCBob
Jul 2015
#25
So plez be specific. On which issues do you think he isn't in tune with the public? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#180
Well 12, 000 people in a RED STATE tonight, don't agree with you! Looks like
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#160
By your own source, Ron Paul never drew 10,000 and over -- much less two weeks in a row.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#171
Right? It seems like some WANT to lose the White House. Polling is a normal part of politics. If
Metric System
Jul 2015
#34
Those hedge fund titans know how to influence public opinion. Hillary is good for business.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#50
Random statistics analysis or demographic analysis....or money, who needs those to win the WH?
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#54
Two Clintons in hand are better than one Bernie in the bush...it is as simple as that.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#58
Yes, exactly. He doesn't need polls at this point, he knows he has to get his name
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#139
Hillary isn't afraid of the results, she is polling higher than the GOP and other candidates running
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#82
a politican who doesn't poll is like a teacher who doesn't evaluate his or her class
dsc
Jul 2015
#92
That could be the difference between $45 million, $15 million or $2 million.
LiberalAndProud
Jul 2015
#103
“There go my people, I must find out where they are going so I can lead them.”
Babel_17
Jul 2015
#122
With and army of advisors and pollsters and technicians, Clinton can't answer simple question
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#124
This thread really exposes the people who have little knowledge of how campaigns work.
Drunken Irishman
Jul 2015
#126
"He doesn't need pollling" is the happy twin of "He doesn't need SUPERDELEGATES!"
MADem
Jul 2015
#158
As you say, a poll can "let a candidate know if their messaging is clear and understood."
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#142
He doesn't have to spend money on staff the way Hillary does, we are all so willing
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#147
He might be saving money not doing polls now, but if he runs in the General he needs to do them.
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#143
MSM = Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters, speech coaches, smoke & mirror experts, Monsanto, on and on .
orpupilofnature57
Jul 2015
#177