Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Spends 0 on Polling, Hillary Spends $900k. Bernie Doesn't Need Polling [View all]Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)149. Well I can only surmise....
Bernie supporters think Bernie has everything right, all his opinions etc already mimics the best and most pure progressive. In addition Bernie has always been perfect, has never had to evolve on any issue. What would be the point of polls?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Spends 0 on Polling, Hillary Spends $900k. Bernie Doesn't Need Polling [View all]
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
OP
One person's "manipulative and controlling" is another person's "responsive to my concerns and
MADem
Jul 2015
#51
No--it's about targeting the message to the audience, and there's nothing wrong with that.
MADem
Jul 2015
#69
That is true--people who talk and talk and talk about what they see as "wrong," but who have no path
MADem
Jul 2015
#84
Sen Sanders has been saying the same message over and over for years. It doesn't matter
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#152
If "it doesn't matter to him who his audience is" then he'll have trouble in the big wide world.
MADem
Jul 2015
#153
If your "truth" is "guns are good" and "the F-35 is a swell airplane" then YES, it DOES matter. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#164
But Vermont IS homogenous. I think you'd do well to pull the string on the conversation.
MADem
Jul 2015
#176
Sorry, can't do that. There's always a way, but it's often a difficult path. And the older one
MADem
Jul 2015
#184
Don't ask questions that can't be answered, then. That kind of repartee is terribly lame.
MADem
Jul 2015
#188
Exactly right they use polls to measure positive and negative responses to their message.
A Simple Game
Jul 2015
#18
I find it stupefying how a Hillary Clinton supporter would dismiss social media
davidpdx
Jul 2015
#173
I wasn't "mocking social media." I was mocking the POV that it's the be-all and end-all, and
MADem
Jul 2015
#185
You think an elected representative has no need to know what Americans think? (nt)
Recursion
Jul 2015
#7
Yes but they might not win. Polling is about winning. When polls showed supporting same-sex marriage
PoliticAverse
Jul 2015
#44
That's a shame. It was the right thing to do but polls caused them not to it. Too bad
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#179
Candidates, when elected, represent 100% if their constituency, not just those who voted...
George II
Jul 2015
#60
Hillary doesn't need polls. She's got her orders from this country's Overloads and will..
BlueJazz
Jul 2015
#10
they actually require the polling to make the case for how messages are crafted
nashville_brook
Jul 2015
#132
Because he doesn't have to stick his finger in the wind to know where he stands?
99Forever
Jul 2015
#14
I think he knows Vermont-type people very well, but beyond that, I dont think so.
DCBob
Jul 2015
#25
So plez be specific. On which issues do you think he isn't in tune with the public? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#180
Well 12, 000 people in a RED STATE tonight, don't agree with you! Looks like
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#160
By your own source, Ron Paul never drew 10,000 and over -- much less two weeks in a row.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#171
Right? It seems like some WANT to lose the White House. Polling is a normal part of politics. If
Metric System
Jul 2015
#34
Those hedge fund titans know how to influence public opinion. Hillary is good for business.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#50
Random statistics analysis or demographic analysis....or money, who needs those to win the WH?
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#54
Two Clintons in hand are better than one Bernie in the bush...it is as simple as that.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#58
Yes, exactly. He doesn't need polls at this point, he knows he has to get his name
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#139
Hillary isn't afraid of the results, she is polling higher than the GOP and other candidates running
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#82
a politican who doesn't poll is like a teacher who doesn't evaluate his or her class
dsc
Jul 2015
#92
That could be the difference between $45 million, $15 million or $2 million.
LiberalAndProud
Jul 2015
#103
“There go my people, I must find out where they are going so I can lead them.”
Babel_17
Jul 2015
#122
With and army of advisors and pollsters and technicians, Clinton can't answer simple question
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#124
This thread really exposes the people who have little knowledge of how campaigns work.
Drunken Irishman
Jul 2015
#126
"He doesn't need pollling" is the happy twin of "He doesn't need SUPERDELEGATES!"
MADem
Jul 2015
#158
As you say, a poll can "let a candidate know if their messaging is clear and understood."
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#142
He doesn't have to spend money on staff the way Hillary does, we are all so willing
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#147
He might be saving money not doing polls now, but if he runs in the General he needs to do them.
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#143
MSM = Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters, speech coaches, smoke & mirror experts, Monsanto, on and on .
orpupilofnature57
Jul 2015
#177