Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: You know I hated it when Bush bypassed Congress [View all]monmouth
(21,078 posts)1. It all boils down to you gotta do what ya gotta do. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a document that forbids him from doing that. We don't elect kings in the United States.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#5
The President had two years with both houses of Congress to do this. Why didn't he?
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#7
Why did it take a back seat? I was in favor of the legislation, as were a majority of Democrats in
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#20
And I answered yours. It wasn't politically favorable to do so at the time. Now the President
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#24
What does the Catholic/Mormon comment have to do with what we're discussing? President Obama
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#28
Thank you for putting that silly lie to rest. I hear it all the time on talk radio, and usually....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2012
#31
Bush Jr tried to do immigration reform and he was stopped in the same manner.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#14
The majority has the option of changing the rules at the beginning of each session.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#16
Absolutely. The Founding Fathers never envisioned the use of a filibuster at all, let alone a 60
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#22
When Lincoln used the executive pen to suspend Habeus Corpus, he was reviled for it. Historians to
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#23
"Forbids"? Obviously, you're completely wrong, as he did it. And it's been done before.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2012
#30
That's fine. Let's have this debate, but you used the word "forbid", and that's simply not true. nt
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2012
#33
The US Constitution *does* forbid the President from using executive orders to skirt Congress.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#35
When the President writes an executive order that directs a department to *not* enforce a law, then
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#39
You and I cannot/will not settle this. There's a thread in this very forum where an atty general...
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2012
#42
So after these "temporary stays," they will be rounded up and sent back to their countries?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#44
No. This is the first time that a president has issued an executive order to prohibit enforcing
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#46