2016 Postmortem

Arkana

(24,347 posts)

65. Prove it was.

Reply to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)

Sat Jul 25, 2015, 01:33 PM

Jul 2015

You're making the accusation; it's on you to provide proof. Prove it was.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all] cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 OP

If the Repubs would just quit blibbering on about Benghazi-- eridani Jul 2015 #1

You cant prove a negative padfun Jul 2015 #2

After dealing with the right wing for more than 20 years, LakeVermilion Jul 2015 #3

She should have known better, and probably did. Fuddnik Jul 2015 #6

This issue is about being tech savy;right wing concerns are policy/personality centered Divernan Jul 2015 #8

Excellent points, Divernan. k&r, nt. appal_jack Jul 2015 #19

You make so many excellent points and thanks for your discussion of your own experience karynnj Jul 2015 #88

The Clintons' voluminous baggage goes back decades & it's documented. Divernan Jul 2015 #96

The arrogance is strong in that one tularetom Jul 2015 #101

She has hubris to spare. Divernan Jul 2015 #105

Clinton's server was less of a security risk than the State Department's. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #4

and destroying it was less of a risk than alc Jul 2015 #22

Well, you go on and assume the worst, ain't nobody stopping you. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #24

What do you think was in the Benghazi emails you refer to? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #30

I'm trying to wrap my mind around your use of Benghazi, Ambassador Stevens, and Vince Foster. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #49

Do you read the things you post? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #71

It's about not reading urgent messages from an Ambassador, no matter where he's stationed. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #86

So it is about Benghazi. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #90

Your interlocutor did indeed play the Ben Gazi card... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #91

I found it rather amusing ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #92

It is sad how invested they are in this story in the service of a candidate who will never DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #93

Well ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #94

I was taught in Civics one of the roles of president is head of his or her party... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #95

BENGHAZI!!!#!1!1 SunSeeker Jul 2015 #46

Don't you think that if it were hacked someone would be bragging about it? OKNancy Jul 2015 #5

Yeah, those Chinese and Russians. Always gloating Fuddnik Jul 2015 #7

Nope. They'd save it for the general election campaign. Divernan Jul 2015 #10

Bernie will not be the nominee, so you better hope OKNancy Jul 2015 #13

if i were you i would hope hillary is not the nominee restorefreedom Jul 2015 #42

If you were in possession of all the information on her server, would you brag about it now... cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #20

Prove it was. BooScout Jul 2015 #9

Stop running down Democratic candidates with bogus claims of 'Prove it!' randome Jul 2015 #11

Hi DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #15

I guess everyone forgot that my father is gay. randome Jul 2015 #16

The challenge is when you call a man , heterosexual or homosexual DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #17

Please don't delete the references. Sometimes people need to be reminded. Thank You. Laser102 Jul 2015 #25

I disagree with that interpretation but I won't make the same mistake again. randome Jul 2015 #28

It is kind of funny, Ed Snowden fans suddenly so worried about data leaks.... DanTex Jul 2015 #12

No, in fact the IG's have found classified info in her emails--they were stored in her TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #35

Some may have been "classified" years after it was sent... Sancho Jul 2015 #47

The IG said specifically that the info contained within four of forty emails TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #48

You are simply wrong on the law....and the WSJ has already backed off their article. Sancho Jul 2015 #50

The issue I'm discussing is specifically the handling of classified information. TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #53

But email wasn't used to for classified information, so there's no problem.... Sancho Jul 2015 #56

We're just talking past each other. Yes, it matters that classified information TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #58

Then we'll just have to disagree.... Sancho Jul 2015 #69

There are penalties for mishandling classified material, even if it's by TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #70

watch the video...then post your apology... Sancho Jul 2015 #72

?? Not watching the video, what is it about? TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #73

It's the complete explanation of the NYT story with the original documents in hand. Sancho Jul 2015 #74

Does it deal with the Wall Street Journal's reporting that an Inspector TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #75

Yes...but it doesn't matter to Hillary.... Sancho Jul 2015 #77

I think we're talking about different news stories: TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #80

Different version of the same story... Sancho Jul 2015 #81

Classified info was on her server. TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #82

The IG said none of those 40 emails were MARKED classified at the time. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #54

Doesn't matter if they were marked. jeff47 Jul 2015 #55

Bad analogy. Everything at the Manhattan project was classified or secret. Not so with State. nt SunSeeker Jul 2015 #60

And there are plenty of things at state that are classified. jeff47 Jul 2015 #64

They determined that she should not have had that info on her server--marked or not. TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #57

They did not "determine" that Hillary did any wrong. nt SunSeeker Jul 2015 #63

I read it as, "This shit was improperly handled and TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #68

The inquiry is not sought into Hillary Clinton's use of email. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #98

I'm sure it has nothing to do with Hillary LordGlenconner Jul 2015 #85

I'll leave the spreading of right wing fake scandals where they sufrommich Jul 2015 #14

10 DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #18

Benghazi!...nt SidDithers Jul 2015 #21

Wrong topic. Maybe you're thinking of a different thread. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #23

We really need to do something about the <---!!!squirrel!!!---> infestation of DU. Zorra Jul 2015 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #44

This thread is about gyrocopters, not Benghazi. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #83

Not interested...nt SidDithers Jul 2015 #84

It isn't up to us to show evidence it wasn't hacked. It's up to YOU to show evidence it was. wyldwolf Jul 2015 #26

She needed her own server to hide the emails which prove she ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #27

it is only an issue to republicans and apparently Bernie supporters. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #31

Are you suggesting supporters of a certain candidate... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #32

I think Ben Gazzara died a few years ago. What does he have to do with servers and emails? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #34

Nothing, just like servers and e-mails will ultimately have to do ... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #36

Death from a thousand cuts... cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #37

A thousand wishes have no more chance of becoming true than one. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #38

Confucius? Or just confused? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #39

Clarity is my raison d'etre. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #41

We ARE laughing, cherokeeprogressive. We are. randome Jul 2015 #33

. Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2015 #43

The proof you seek is illogical.... Sancho Jul 2015 #45

Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #51

A person charged with a crime has to be proven guilty, the person doesn't have to prove their Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #52

And if this was a trial, that would be relevant. But this is a political campaign. jeff47 Jul 2015 #59

The op contained "Prove it wasn't hacked. SHOW me evidence it wasn't hacked. Prove to me and the Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #61

And my different point is that there is a massive minefield here beyond hacking. (nt) jeff47 Jul 2015 #66

CT Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #67

Yes, much easier than addressing the point I made. jeff47 Jul 2015 #99

Evidence? Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #100

Your interest in this begins and ends with Hillary LordGlenconner Jul 2015 #62

Prove it was. Arkana Jul 2015 #65

It's not even about security, it's about judgement and common sense. HappyPlace Jul 2015 #76

The real issue is that everything can be hacked... Agschmid Jul 2015 #78

Sure, you care so much about security risks BainsBane Jul 2015 #79

Who is "you all"? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #87

Are you claiming you didn't support the Wikileaks release BainsBane Jul 2015 #89

Are you claiming I did? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #97

Hacked/not-hacked is not the issue in my mind. delrem Jul 2015 #102

I agree this is troublesome. BKH70041 Jul 2015 #103

On what issues is Bernie to the left of most Americans? MannyGoldstein Jul 2015 #104

Yawn philosslayer Jul 2015 #106