Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
7. It's not about leaks. It's about poor judgement.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 01:49 PM
Jul 2015

Someone takes a document that Manning leaked, and emails it to Clinton. That's a security breach. The document is still classified, and she stored it on an unclassified system. Since she has a security clearance, she can not do that.

She could not be prosecuted for it, because it does not break federal law. What it does break is several executive orders regarding the handling of classified information. The worst punishment she could have faced for it was taking away her security clearance and destruction of the server. Since she no longer has a clearance, that is mostly moot.

Do you really think it is good for a candidate to get down into the weeds about executive orders versus laws when defending herself about "national secrets"?

This server is a massive minefield. We are taking a stroll through it. It is possible we will walk through unscathed. That does not mean our stroll is a good idea.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Regarding Classified Stat...»Reply #7