Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
55. you are much more optimistic than i am
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:40 PM
Jul 2015

i don't think she can win a general, which means a possible r sweep.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The DNC did not prepare for the possibility that Zorra Jul 2015 #1
and hey, if it costs the dems the general restorefreedom Jul 2015 #2
Isn't the DNC's responsiblity to see that Bernie wins. It's Bernie's and his supporters. They answer jtuck004 Jul 2015 #14
Wrong about "It's the people they need to save, not the Democrats." thesquanderer Jul 2015 #16
So how are they serving me? I have been a Democrat all my life. If they do not change this jwirr Jul 2015 #30
It isn't their responsibility to see that Hillary wins, either. winter is coming Jul 2015 #17
In reality, if it looks like Bernie is really threatening Ms. Clinton, then all they have to do is jtuck004 Jul 2015 #20
Yep. Repubs vs. Dems is just theater. The real division is HAVES vs. HAVE-NOTS. Any right winger GoneFishin Jul 2015 #43
Nope not a mistake at all. zeemike Jul 2015 #18
In the early 1900s, there was this union called the IWW. They were for worker control of assets, jtuck004 Jul 2015 #27
I totally agree zeemike Jul 2015 #33
"the only one I see around that can pull that off is Sanders." < this. jtuck004 Jul 2015 #35
and Bernie is running as a Democrat, so he is part of the two party system. still_one Jul 2015 #32
Well that is the only way to change things. zeemike Jul 2015 #36
My point exactly, and Bernie made that clear when he started his run still_one Jul 2015 #37
It IS their responsibility to see that all their candidates have a voice BuelahWitch Jul 2015 #25
Well, at least you think so, and in an ideal world I would think so too. But I don't jtuck004 Jul 2015 #29
That's just stupid. Maedhros Jul 2015 #53
Why are six debates not sufficient? Gothmog Jul 2015 #3
it is not only the number of them restorefreedom Jul 2015 #4
Too true kenfrequed Jul 2015 #23
The other three are being hurt badly restorefreedom Jul 2015 #26
You have one well known candidate and 4 relatively unknown candidates. The limited number of jwirr Jul 2015 #34
Big time Hillary fan here. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #5
DWS has been a disaster ibegurpard Jul 2015 #6
Absolutely. I won't give any money to anyone other than Bernie Sanders personally. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #22
I still get the "sky is falling" money requests from them ibegurpard Jul 2015 #31
Thank you so much. Just what needed to be said. jwirr Jul 2015 #40
that is what upsets me restorefreedom Jul 2015 #7
I agree and have made a point to talk about it. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #8
thx! nt restorefreedom Jul 2015 #9
Going to follow this up with an op containing contact info for DWS. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #10
excellent! restorefreedom Jul 2015 #11
Maybe no one else wants the job? JDPriestly Jul 2015 #38
Who appoints the head of the DNC? jwirr Jul 2015 #41
supposedly the dnc elects them restorefreedom Jul 2015 #44
Okay, not much we can do about that. jwirr Jul 2015 #45
i guess if there was enough of an outcry restorefreedom Jul 2015 #52
Yes, because her strategy will get us Hillary without the Senate. She already lost us the House jwirr Jul 2015 #54
you are much more optimistic than i am restorefreedom Jul 2015 #55
Oh, that would not surprise me. There is a reason she is hiding out and giving out a soundbite jwirr Jul 2015 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #51
Meanwhile, the herd of GOP candidates are repeating their talking points 5,000 times, snot Jul 2015 #12
Not just that. They will also be controlling the framing RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #13
Yes! snot Jul 2015 #15
Yes, good post. Dem debates need to start when Repub debates do. thesquanderer Jul 2015 #19
thx have to send the nod to restorefreedom Jul 2015 #28
Look Cosmocat Jul 2015 #21
its not just the number of them restorefreedom Jul 2015 #24
oh yeah Cosmocat Jul 2015 #47
What you said. A Simple Game Jul 2015 #39
Six is ample Cosmocat Jul 2015 #48
High horse? I don't even have a pony! A Simple Game Jul 2015 #50
Jesus christ Cosmocat Jul 2015 #57
Debates are only one form of information, yes for once we agree. A Simple Game Jul 2015 #61
Two points - you talk about the Rs and their train wreck - I don't think any of us care. Then you jwirr Jul 2015 #42
Six is plenty Cosmocat Jul 2015 #49
like a Latin army, their reaction to being contradicted by reality is to get more vocal MisterP Jul 2015 #46
I'm not worried... druidity33 Jul 2015 #58
a canoe of calm restorefreedom Jul 2015 #59
The dems have been behind the 8 ball since Reagan dissed the word liberal. CrispyQ Jul 2015 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»why the delayed dem debat...»Reply #55