Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "Hillary Helps a Bank—and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons" [View all]
murielm99
(32,988 posts)22. Then you don't belong on this website.
Hillary will be the nominee. If you don't vote for the Democratic nominee, then you have no business here.
The name of the website has been pointed out several times in this thread.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Hillary Helps a Bank—and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons" [View all]
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
OP
To skate on the edge would be to have duel citizenship, Swiss as Mrs. Bachmann the IRS lawyer
Sunlei
Aug 2015
#25
The phrase "conflict of interest" doesn't apply here--that implies an ethical dilemma.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#44
Depositing money in Bill Clinton's personal checking account is philanthropy?
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#3
Many people here are deeply uncomfortable with the "Underground" part of the name
nxylas
Aug 2015
#20
Except DailyKOS, and this thread fails to point out that their is no evidence
still_one
Aug 2015
#28
"One needn’t believe that there’s ever been any quid pro quo to see that this matters."
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#31
“It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,”
udbcrzy2
Aug 2015
#55
Since you didn't note there is no evidence in the OP, I am not sure what that means
still_one
Aug 2015
#29
No evidence of what? Government official protected bank. Then bank paid spouse millions.
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#30
It isn't me, it is in the original WSJ article which stated no evidence of any link between Mrs.
still_one
Aug 2015
#32
What's your explanation for why UBS paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million speaking fees?
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#33
If I report a story taken from the original source, I put in the disclaimers also from the source
still_one
Aug 2015
#34
Disclaimer: "One needn’t believe that there’s ever been any quid pro quo to see that this matters."
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#35
wow. Crystal ball? I think they said that in 2008 too. so Hillary sycophancy is the price of admissi
roguevalley
Aug 2015
#24
In your opinion if Mrs. Clinton is 'skeezy' who is out there in the running to vote for?
Sunlei
Aug 2015
#26
There is no evidence. This was posted in another thread earlier which made the same allegation
still_one
Aug 2015
#27
Just looks bad. Tone deaf. "Bad optics". It has the appearance of impropriety, at the least.
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#36
Appreciate that you responded to each one of my responses. This last one makes the most sense in my
still_one
Aug 2015
#37
I work in the government and people keep on handing me millions of dollars for no reason
Cheese Sandwich
Aug 2015
#50