2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone really think the GOP wouldn't hammer Bernie about being a socialist 24/7? [View all]virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)but seriously, anarchist and klansman are terms that are many orders of magnitude more objectionable.
Republican?......It isn't the label that turns me off....just every word that comes out of their mouths.
It isn't that I don't agree with the assertion that some will be put off by the socialist term, but those people consider Democrat and Socialist to be equivalent terms.
This thread is entitled "Does anyone really think the GOP wouldn't hammer Bernie about being a socialist 24/7?"
They have been doing that to President Obama for eight years.
It didn't stop him from being elected and re-elected.
My problem with this thread is its conclusion that the results of a poll are written in stone. Leaders persuade people to do necessary things that they haven't thought of. That changes poll numbers and it wins elections.
The "leaders" of the Democratic Party, with their poll crafted messages, are endlessly scanning the thoughts of the people. Then they try to merge those thoughts with the requirements of their donors, and they spit back out to us a toothless, sanitized
solutionto our problems.
I can't resign myself to supporting an approach this weak and calculating unless I am absolutely forced to do so.