2016 Postmortem

Autumn

(48,965 posts)

47. One hand washes the other.

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Sat Aug 1, 2015, 10:26 AM

Aug 2015

Of course there's no evidence. It's all a mere coincidence. But you know what? It doe look bad and that happens all too often with Hillary and Bill. Do I believe it was a bribe? No I do not but it gives the right what they want should by some chance she win the White House. You think Whitewater was investigated? You ain't seen nothing.

The pukes got a lot more to distract from now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Hillary Helps a Bank�and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons" [View all] Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 OP

Get out! A whiff of impropriety from the Clintons? NEVER! TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #1

They love to skate right on the edge. artislife Aug 2015 #9

To skate on the edge would be to have duel citizenship, Swiss as Mrs. Bachmann the IRS lawyer Sunlei Aug 2015 #25

Didn't she promise there'd never be a hint of conflict-of-interest if names SOS? Scuba Aug 2015 #41

The phrase "conflict of interest" doesn't apply here--that implies an ethical dilemma. TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #44

I see what you did there. Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #58

Now we're demonizing philanthropy? JaneyVee Aug 2015 #2

Depositing money in Bill Clinton's personal checking account is philanthropy? Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #3

Perfectly. Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #5

Heh! nt artislife Aug 2015 #10

The Chappaqua trust for the dead broke. pa28 Aug 2015 #54

LMAO! beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #4

Wouldn't it be nice if some posters went after the GOP... Beaverhausen Aug 2015 #6

Democratic underground artislife Aug 2015 #13

Have you read the purpose of the site? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #16

I skimmed it Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #49

I thought that too. Underground. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #18

Many people here are deeply uncomfortable with the "Underground" part of the name nxylas Aug 2015 #20

It was underground in response to Republican and Conservative rule.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #51

What a sense of humor you have. 840high Aug 2015 #12

Conflict of interest is how she rolls. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #7

Thanks for this break down Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #15

Except DailyKOS, and this thread fails to point out that their is no evidence still_one Aug 2015 #28

"One needn�t believe that there�s ever been any quid pro quo to see that this matters." Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #31

It does seem a little pearl clutchy AlbertCat Aug 2015 #46

�It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,� udbcrzy2 Aug 2015 #55

Seems about right. malokvale77 Aug 2015 #8

I wish it weren't true. snot Aug 2015 #11

Dont worry then... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #17

No sense pretending this stuff didn't happen... Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #59

Nonsense believing it did actually. VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #61

So do I Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #19

Since you didn't note there is no evidence in the OP, I am not sure what that means still_one Aug 2015 #29

No evidence of what? Government official protected bank. Then bank paid spouse millions. Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #30

It isn't me, it is in the original WSJ article which stated no evidence of any link between Mrs. still_one Aug 2015 #32

What's your explanation for why UBS paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million speaking fees? Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #33

If I report a story taken from the original source, I put in the disclaimers also from the source still_one Aug 2015 #34

Disclaimer: "One needn�t believe that there�s ever been any quid pro quo to see that this matters." Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #35

Morning Joe discussion on this kenn3d Aug 2015 #14

Morning Joke? One of the 99 Aug 2015 #45

They're skeezy. SoapBox Aug 2015 #21

Then you don't belong on this website. murielm99 Aug 2015 #22

wow. Crystal ball? I think they said that in 2008 too. so Hillary sycophancy is the price of admissi roguevalley Aug 2015 #24

In your opinion if Mrs. Clinton is 'skeezy' who is out there in the running to vote for? Sunlei Aug 2015 #26

here's what I think ericson00 Aug 2015 #23

There is no evidence. This was posted in another thread earlier which made the same allegation still_one Aug 2015 #27

Just looks bad. Tone deaf. "Bad optics". It has the appearance of impropriety, at the least. Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #36

Appreciate that you responded to each one of my responses. This last one makes the most sense in my still_one Aug 2015 #37

I don't mean to piggyback but it just looks bad. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #38

Thank you Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #39

. stonecutter357 Aug 2015 #40

Finger wags are extra. FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #42

This is only with the deluxe package Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #48

Some people live in a world of "happy accidents" Babel_17 Aug 2015 #43

I work in the government and people keep on handing me millions of dollars for no reason Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #50

One hand washes the other. Autumn Aug 2015 #47

Well you certainly seem concerned. zappaman Aug 2015 #52

Thank you! Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #53

Expect eight years of scandal and rationalizing if Clinton wins. pa28 Aug 2015 #56

Let's try to not to go down that road. Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #57

I don't even know why this is news TransitJohn Aug 2015 #60