Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
54. The DNC has already decided who the nominee will be, now they want to keep her hidden
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 04:47 PM
Aug 2015

They don't want her to be put in any situation where she can "misspeak", lie, put her foot in her mouth or otherwise commit one of the verbal faux pas to which she is prone.

So their plan is to limit her exposure to the voting public to situations in which she can be kept under control or scripted appearances in which no extemporaneous speaking is allowed.

So get ready for tons of schmaltzy maudlin campaign ads featuring her sainted grandma, her beloved fourth grade teacher, and for all I know, her pet goldfish. Get ready for "listening tours" where she pretends to pay attention to voters concerns and then pontificates about bold solutions to them. You might even see a totally rehearsed Q&A session where planted stooges get up and ask "incisive" questions that were prepared for them by her staff. But what you'll never see is her in an unrehearsed, unstaged, genuine situation where somebody gets to hit her with a question she didn't already know the answer to.

It's all smoke and mirrors and if we never get to see her having to be real, we have to accept that the manufactured, stage managed, cardboard cutout is actually the real thing. Or at least she hopes we do,

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

+1. I don't want a debate every week, but damn, we need more. winter is coming Aug 2015 #1
If it wasn't for Trump mimi85 Aug 2015 #69
Debate junkies want more Blue_Adept Aug 2015 #2
May be the dumbest rationale I've ever seen whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #4
Because the only way to learn is from a debate! Blue_Adept Aug 2015 #5
Then in your opinion whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #9
It's what I keep hearing all over JackInGreen Aug 2015 #32
Democrats against democracy is vogue whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #34
It's horrible, isn't it? Hard to believe. senz Aug 2015 #42
An actual DNC that is limiting free speech by using an exclusivity rule. This is not the DNC that jwirr Aug 2015 #58
No, that isn't a free speech issue mythology Aug 2015 #76
Private entity? They are supported by OUR money. But they listen to only themselves. You have jwirr Aug 2015 #85
You captured it! artislife Aug 2015 #71
I don't think I've ever learned anything about a candidate in a "debate." Adrahil Aug 2015 #86
It's not the sole manner in which they decide whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #88
"Debates" are stump speeches in 1 minute bits. Adrahil Aug 2015 #89
People have an unfortunate habit of projecting their beliefs and habits onto others whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #90
Sure. It's my opinion. Adrahil Aug 2015 #91
The Republicans are hogging the airwaves and brain-washing voters. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #10
Every Repub debate the MSM validates Repub insanity:war,antiabortion, tax cuts, reg cuts,prejudice stuffmatters Aug 2015 #33
Exactly. senz Aug 2015 #45
Exactly. It's like listening to the Limpballs--the more you bbgrunt Aug 2015 #43
Debate junkies are the folks that decide who wins in the general election. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #12
Don't even have to be a debate junkie. Millions of TV watchers don't read much senz Aug 2015 #46
Was their a poll taken that shows that people want fewer debates? frylock Aug 2015 #39
Then don't watch them. Seems to me that the ones who do not want to watch are not to interested jwirr Aug 2015 #57
Let me explain why six is plenty whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #3
In-depth explanation. Thanks. Very a propos. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #6
...and? [n/t] Maedhros Aug 2015 #7
And "debates don't matter", which is why we absolutely can't have more of them. winter is coming Aug 2015 #8
It's "Hillary Logic". Maedhros Aug 2015 #11
We all know that Bill Clinton was a great debater and that Hillary is a lousy one. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #14
Hillary Clinton is the only candidate for either party who has released her health records.... George II Aug 2015 #23
Ah. So y'all ARE paying attention. senz Aug 2015 #48
Amen.......Especially the last paragraph. We want to make our own decisions. jwirr Aug 2015 #60
'twas satire whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #13
You were confusing me :) [n/t] Maedhros Aug 2015 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author chknltl Aug 2015 #19
Wow...you convinced me! InAbLuEsTaTe Aug 2015 #51
Great explanation. Thanks jwirr Aug 2015 #59
Last night wasn't a debate. jalan48 Aug 2015 #16
You are right, but my arrguments for more Democratic debates still stand. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #18
Yes it does. I am in agreement with you on that. jalan48 Aug 2015 #20
+ 1 senz Aug 2015 #49
Thank you! skepticscott Aug 2015 #38
And we get only six artislife Aug 2015 #72
Total Agreement kenfrequed Aug 2015 #17
The plan was to have ONE debate between Hillary and a pinwheel hat. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #21
... senz Aug 2015 #50
Which she might still have needed artislife Aug 2015 #73
K&R Great post JD. The Democratic Party isn't looking very democratic right now 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #22
Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government." T. Jefferson Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #24
More debates would be a good thing for democracy. azmom Aug 2015 #25
More debates MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #26
If more debates will change nothing, there's no reason, none, for the exclusivity clause. winter is coming Aug 2015 #35
I think it is going to be the exact opposite this election. We are deciding the direction of our jwirr Aug 2015 #62
The RNC was correct in that too many debates hurt Romney Gothmog Aug 2015 #27
Too many debates hurt Romney because he was trying to sell bad ideas. winter is coming Aug 2015 #36
This. n/t jtuck004 Aug 2015 #28
Not really. Drunken Irishman Aug 2015 #29
Brilliant cartoon from Truthout sums it all up... senz Aug 2015 #30
XLNT post. n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #31
Hear, Hear. EEO Aug 2015 #37
Why don't we just turn it into a reality show and vote for our favorite candidate every week? Deadshot Aug 2015 #40
They won't go for it artislife Aug 2015 #74
Excellent, well-written, very convincing essay, JPriestly. senz Aug 2015 #41
I learned a few things from last nights debate. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #44
Between now and October DonCoquixote Aug 2015 #47
Probably the best advice she's heard all year. nt senz Aug 2015 #52
thank you DonCoquixote Aug 2015 #55
There are 16 GOP candidates declared, they have 11 debates scheduled. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #53
The Republican. Candidates will repeat and argue about their lies, their false. Assumptions JDPriestly Aug 2015 #78
And you think the DNC candidates will not repeat the same argument over and over. BTW the false Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #84
The DNC has already decided who the nominee will be, now they want to keep her hidden tularetom Aug 2015 #54
+1. Wanna know why the debates are so limited this go 'round? Hillary's afraid. winter is coming Aug 2015 #56
yup. restorefreedom Aug 2015 #61
You mean like her criminal justice reform proposal? brooklynite Aug 2015 #75
It's because our Democratic candidates have so many great ideas and proposals that I am JDPriestly Aug 2015 #80
agreed. restorefreedom Aug 2015 #83
^^^THIS^^^ jwirr Aug 2015 #64
It appears that the academic research has studied the effects of debates ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #63
These are about the general election debates, as far as I can tell. arcane1 Aug 2015 #66
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #67
1979??? JDPriestly Aug 2015 #79
Yes ... 1979 ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #82
Thank you. It's a no brainer, and yes DNC, Inc. is selling us out. nt Zorra Aug 2015 #65
Good post, well done dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #68
If the DNC doesn't feel up to sponsoring more than six debates, let someone else winter is coming Aug 2015 #70
Great idea- we need to educate about scrapping the cap, planned parenthood, Iran deal, TPP stuffmatters Aug 2015 #92
IMHO, 2 many debates which are really joint news conferences dilutes their impack BlueStateLib Aug 2015 #77
Republican framing is what Neo-liberals need MoveIt Aug 2015 #81
Yes we the people, need more debates, REAL debates, however the DNC apparently sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #87
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We need more, more, more,...»Reply #54