2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Holy, are there people here seriously defending BLM Seattle's actions!?? What's wrong with you? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It never has been either/or.
Why can't you accept that there isn't a conflict between supporting BLM's objectives and at the same time wanting the most progressive and anti-oppression candidate of them all to be nominated and elected?
And really, why should anybody trust the candidate you've chosen to support, who as the least-progressive person running as a Dem is automatically going to be the most suspect on civil rights issues, to genuinely care about what BLM stands for?. Fine, she's "electable"
the polls now show Bernie is too, btw) but she's always been a "law and order/zero tolerance/Broken Windows" type in her record on police issues. She's better than the R's by default, but you can't really believe she can be better on this than the overall-most-transformative candidate.