Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,291 posts)
9. that wasn't his experience in my state
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 01:57 PM
Aug 2015

O'Malley not only implemented a four-year freeze on tuition for Maryland institutions of higher learning, making higher education more affordable for Marylanders, from 2008-10 he increased college appropriations to offset the freezes and authorized more than $220 million in state capital funds to community colleges. He also budgeted more than $333 million for grants and scholarships, and in 2011, signed legislation extending in-state tuition to undocumented students. O'Malley also oversaw the reinvigoration of Maryland’s Career and Technology Education and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) programs statewide, and the launching of the comprehensive Maryland STEM Innovation Network to promote the delivery of high quality STEM education at all levels throughout the state.

Those accomplishments in education in Maryland are reflected in the detailed education plan he's offered in this campaign to make higher education affordable, accessible & accountable. His proposals that, as a national goal, all students have access to a high-quality, debt-free college education within 5 years, attainable at any in-state public college or university; increasing college completion rates by 25 percentage points within 10 years, and eliminating discrepancies in graduation rates based on race and income; are matched by a detailed plan to:

•Refinance Student Loans:
•Tie Minimum Payments to Incomes:
•Freeze Public Tuition Rates:
•Restore State Higher Education Funding:
He is also calling on states to restore investments in higher education. As president, he would partner with states, leveraging federal dollars through matching grants to encourage states to increase funding for public colleges and universities
•Increase Pell Grants:
•Expand and Modernize Work-Study:
•Match federal grant programs and obtain additional aid dollars to encourage colleges to increase on-time graduation rates, improve education quality, and direct aid toward students who need it most:
•Develop new incentives to encourage colleges and universities to help ensure students graduate on time:
•Make Childcare Affordable on Campus:
•Reduce Time to Graduation: Expand Access to Early College Credit: and
•Require colleges to meet accountability targets in recruitment, completion, and risk-sharing.




details of his plan include:

Providing Immediate Relief to Student Borrowers
Nearly 70 percent of U.S. students are now graduating with student debt, averaging more than $28,000 in loans. Unlike homeowners or businesses, student borrowers and their families can’t refinance their loans to take advantage of lower interest rates.

Refinancing Student Loans. All Americans with student debt – including both students and their parents – should be able to refinance their loans at lower rates.

Tying Minimum Payments to Incomes. All student borrowers should be automatically enrolled in income-based repayment plans, with loan forgiveness options. Borrowers who do not wish to use repayment plans would be able to opt out of them while those with private loans should be able to refinance into federal programs.

Stopping Skyrocketing Tuition Rates
States have slashed higher education investments by an average of 20 percent per student since 2008. Colleges have used tuition increases to make up for 80 percent of lost funding.

Freezing Public Tuition Rates. Governor O’Malley is calling on states to immediately freeze tuition rates.

Restoring State Higher Education Funding. He is also calling on states to restore investments in higher education. As president, he would partner with states, leveraging federal dollars through matching grants to encourage states to increase funding for public colleges and universities.

Reducing Tuition Costs
Almost all states have seen double or even triple digit percentage increases in tuition over the past 10 years. As a result, tuition rates at public four-year institutions are now more than 20 percent of state median income in 10 states.

Tying Tuition Rates to Median Incomes. Governor O’Malley would set a national goal of reducing the cost of tuition – to no more than 10 percent of state median income at four-year public universities, and to no more than 5 percent of median income at two-year public colleges. While institutions would be challenged to maintain quality and innovate in education and teaching to cut down on costs, states would be required to maintain their own funding efforts which, along with the increased funding from the matching grant program, would ensure universities do not suffer any decrease in educational quality while meeting these goals.

Helping Low- and Middle-Income Students Cover Non-Tuition Costs
Debt-free college must apply to all college costs, not just tuition. But room and board is roughly double the cost of tuition on average. This brings the total cost of attendance up to nearly $19,000 a year for in-state students at four-year public universities. And federal support has not kept pace: while Pell Grants once covered nearly 70% of the cost of college for low-income students, they now cover only a third.

Increasing Pell Grants. Pell Grants and state grants should be increased to cover the bulk of non-tuition costs for students who otherwise couldn’t afford them.

Expanding and Modernizing Work-Study. The need-based federal work-study program should be tripled so that at least two million students can participate. The program would be redesigned to make placements career-focused, and to better support low- and middle-income, part-time, and mid-career students. It will be essential to ensure the program hours are equitable and do not create additional economic hardship or detract from a quality education.

PROPOSAL: Set a national goal of increasing college completion rates by 25 percentage points within 10 years, and eliminating discrepancies in graduation rates based on race and income.

Partnering With States and Schools to Improve Completion Rates
Fewer than 40 percent of students of all ages graduate from four-year institutions within four years. Low-income students are the least likely to graduate, with only nine percent of students from the lowest income bracket earning a bachelor’s degree by the time they turned 24.

Giving Colleges Incentives to Lead. Matching federal grant programs and additional aid dollars should be used to encourage colleges to increase on-time graduation rates, improve education quality, and direct aid toward students who need it most.

Decoupling Profits from Longer Completion Times. Federal and state governments should develop new incentives to encourage colleges and universities to help ensure students graduate on time.

Supporting Part-Time and Mid-Career Students
Roughly six million students attend college part-time, with five million students also supporting families while pursuing their degree. Unsurprisingly, part-time students are three times more likely to drop out than full-time students.

Making Childcare Affordable on Campus. A first priority for supporting this group of strivers is providing safe, high quality childcare on campus. Federal and state government should share the costs of increasing access to childcare for student parents.

Creating Multiple Pathways to Graduation
Four years of classes are not always required for students to master the skills needed to enter a discipline, and many students learn better outside of the classroom. All measures should ensure access to an equal and quality education for all students at a given school, regardless of income.

Reducing Time to Graduation. The federal government should encourage schools to employ competency-based education strategies, which allow students to learn at their own pace, saving both money and time.

Encouraging Expanded Online and Blended Learning, Project-Based Learning, and Course Redesign.

Increasing College Preparedness
Although high school graduation rates are at a record-high 80 percent, one-third of high school students are unprepared for entry-level college courses.

Expanding Access to Early College Credit. The federal government should support innovative efforts to better prepare high schoolers for college, like expanded accelerated learning and dual-enrollment programs.

Expanding Access to Quality College Counseling. Better access to counseling is critical to helping lower-income and first-generation students apply for, navigate, and graduate from college, increasing college enrollment and graduation rates overall.

Holding For-Profit Colleges Accountable
Less than a quarter of students enrolled in for-profit institutions graduate, while the 11 percent of students who attend them represent almost half of all student loan defaults.

Setting Strict Accountability Targets. President Obama’s aggressive efforts to prevent abuse, including the new gainful employment rule, should be expanded, to require colleges to meet accountability targets in recruitment, completion, and risk-sharing

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R. n/t FSogol Aug 2015 #1
Main problem with her plan: Her plan is more "easy credit". jeff47 Aug 2015 #2
I'm not sure that makes sense hill2016 Aug 2015 #7
Your long haul is too short. Also, we are not individuals in a vacuum. jeff47 Aug 2015 #8
yes hill2016 Aug 2015 #10
They're paying less taxes (directly and indirectly) during the 20 years they are paying the loan. jeff47 Aug 2015 #16
but hill2016 Aug 2015 #18
One time. Spending is taxed multiple times. jeff47 Aug 2015 #19
that makes even less sense hill2016 Aug 2015 #22
Depends on the overall state of the economy. jeff47 Aug 2015 #23
You're overlooking progressive taxation Jim Lane Aug 2015 #20
if this Goldman guy hill2016 Aug 2015 #21
Goldman guy can't guarantee he'll have a high-paying job when he takes out the loan. jeff47 Aug 2015 #25
Why add the complexity of a loan? jeff47 Aug 2015 #24
Partly because, as you note, the taxing mechanism isn't perfect Jim Lane Aug 2015 #29
Colleges could be a lot cheaper Qutzupalotl Aug 2015 #3
HRC, as always, too little and too late. Divernan Aug 2015 #4
Hillary's plan < O'Malley's plan < Bernie's universal plan Fearless Aug 2015 #5
Yeh, Third Way corporate profit ClintonED and O'MalleyED vs. Bernie's free education Zorra Aug 2015 #12
+1 Fearless Aug 2015 #14
Totally free four year college is a pandering pipe dream redstateblues Aug 2015 #28
Freezing public college tuition is a stupid idea. aikoaiko Aug 2015 #6
that wasn't his experience in my state bigtree Aug 2015 #9
Are you sure? February 3, 2015 Update: state budget deficits and UMD budget cuts aikoaiko Aug 2015 #11
Yikes. Agschmid Aug 2015 #13
you should realize that all states were forced to make adjustments to budgets due to sequestration bigtree Aug 2015 #15
sure, but it highlights why tuition freezes are a problem. aikoaiko Aug 2015 #26
it more highlights the consequenses of the 2013 sequestration bigtree Aug 2015 #27
Thank you for laying this out. Incredibly impressive work. askew Aug 2015 #17
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton's 'Debt-F...»Reply #9