2016 Postmortem

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

7. "They wouldn't give two shits about her email of she weren't running."

Wed Aug 12, 2015, 07:21 PM

Aug 2015

Exactly. Because she wouldn't be looking to be taking over the most important job in the country. You want someone you feel you can trust in that job.

But I agree that no government official should be using their own personal servers for anything.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton: Trustworthy or not? [View all] magicmama Aug 2015 OP

Not a HRC supporter but I believe the emails onecaliberal Aug 2015 #1

Colin Powell isn't running for President. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #2

I don't give a rip. They are in a witch hunt. onecaliberal Aug 2015 #4

"They wouldn't give two shits about her email of she weren't running." Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #7

I don't trust her and this fake scandal that onecaliberal Aug 2015 #11

Email is the new Bengazhi, even Congressman Voldemort (Slitheryn) wants a piece of the action. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #17

Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I still think candidates for President John Poet Aug 2015 #12

You're entitled to your opinion. I just disagree. onecaliberal Aug 2015 #13

Well, it certainly isn't helpful to her campaign. John Poet Aug 2015 #18

Yes. onecaliberal Aug 2015 #23

except for the fact that MBS Aug 2015 #35

Yeah we see how well that work since onecaliberal Aug 2015 #36

I hope liberals are not also going to join in on the GOP hypocrisy bandwagon, as you say. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #20

It shows her lack of ethical standards magicmama Aug 2015 #3

Your post is funny. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #9

+1 840high Aug 2015 #21

Colin Powell said he used presonal email, NOT personal email exclusively for govt business. RiverLover Aug 2015 #24

We were very much interested in Colin Powell's emails.. frylock Aug 2015 #32

the email "scandal" is largely phony, hence not a solid criterion on which to rest such a judgment 0rganism Aug 2015 #5

^^That^^ onecaliberal Aug 2015 #6

Misrepresentation by a new poser couched in sympathetic passive-aggressive tones implying impending doom...too funny. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #8

Not "impending doom"-- John Poet Aug 2015 #10

What do you think the Republicans are wanting Clinton as the nominee? magicmama Aug 2015 #15

Huh? Republicans don't want to face Hillary in the GE. Why do you think they're trying to take her Metric System Aug 2015 #22

You just lost a lot of credibility with that comment. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #27

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #29

I beg your pardon! You rely on some anecdotes and make big assumptions. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #30

I don't trust her, but the emails have nothing to do with it. CharlotteVale Aug 2015 #14

maybe not, but in general, it's not just the email issue, but the trustworthiness issue magicmama Aug 2015 #16

I trust her...she's a Van de Graf generator of scandal static HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #38

A-G-E-N-D-A, what's that spell????? giftedgirl77 Aug 2015 #19

not. but for me, restorefreedom Aug 2015 #25

She's as trustworthy as most politicians, moreso than many. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #26

Is "not" acceptable? seveneyes Aug 2015 #28

I don't trust her because her rhetoric ibegurpard Aug 2015 #31

It's another witch hunt. Lil Missy Aug 2015 #33

Wow, the OP has a pro-Bernie thread going. I wonder if oasis Aug 2015 #43

Wait till they start with the infamous "Hillary Under Fire" Indepatriot Aug 2015 #34

Hillary has been sucessful operating in the fashion which best suits her. oasis Aug 2015 #37

The email bull nonsense will be the 1996 Lincoln Bedroom "for sale" Dawson Leery Aug 2015 #39

Too bad the GOP has the help of some "Democrats" to oasis Aug 2015 #40

Those who wish to undermine her are here at DU too. Dawson Leery Aug 2015 #41

Right wing talking points not off limits. Open season oasis Aug 2015 #42