Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Could a 'President Bernie Sanders' deliver? [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)57. No, you aren't getting it. Being there to prevent a GOP President from doing what they would do
in conjunction with a GOP congress is not "symbolic".
Preventing bad things from happening is not the same thing as doing nothing as a symbol implies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I noticed a sea-change in reporting when Bernie polled seven points over HRC in the NH poll.
Stardust
Aug 2015
#90
He would definitely take his issues to the people, no to Corporate Ceos. I think he would
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#2
In large part, I agree, should Bernie be nominated and elected; that kind of watershed momentum
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#6
I agree and also don't forget the long lines for mostly African Americans in trying to vote, Bernie
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#12
I agree on all counts mikehiggins but I believe the exceptionally large turnouts at
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#8
LOL "he just might" ... do what?! Convince the overtly treasonous gerrymandered GOP congress to do
uponit7771
Aug 2015
#16
Sanders would be expected to be somewhat consistent within the restraints of reality
Armstead
Aug 2015
#19
That's not what Im hearing from him...Voting day a national holiday?... with this GOP congress?
uponit7771
Aug 2015
#23
(Edited) I've had the last six years of evidence to inform my opinion. And I learned from it.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#21
Nope. He had a city council willing to work with him. He won't have that with the GOP congress. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#25
Reality isn't always what you want it to be, but it's best to work within it. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#32
The GOP congressmen who are ensconced in safe gerrymandered districts dont care what we do. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#37
Yes there will. We will have a GOP house through 2022 at least and probably through 2024 due to
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#31
Has nothing to do with strategy. Redistricting isnt done again until after the 2020 census. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#36
the "tired" strategy is imagining that voters and non-voters are locked in place
virtualobserver
Aug 2015
#40
I don't subscribe to magical thinking that staunch GOP voters can magically be made progressives. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#43
That's not thinking outside the box. It's magical thinking. There is a difference.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#64
Nope, that is your straw man. We must hold the white house and make what gains we can
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#44
If that's the only purpose of politics then, why not have a fighter in that symbolic position?
Armstead
Aug 2015
#48
No, you aren't getting it. Being there to prevent a GOP President from doing what they would do
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#57
Nope. Nothing anyone can do will change Republican behavior. That's your big mistake. They dont care
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#67
Adressing your edit -- Bill Clinton set the table for GWBush and the damage that followed
Armstead
Aug 2015
#39
No, it has nothing to do with Clinton's actions. It has to do with analyzing GOP actions. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#41
Nope, we're talking about what 2016-2024 will be like and how the past informs that.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#46
the past only "informs" that because the DNC is the same tired losing plan
virtualobserver
Aug 2015
#66
Nope. Nothing anyone can do will change Republican behavior. It's mistaken thinking to think
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#68
In general that depends. In practice THIS gerrymandering cannot be overcome. We know that from 2012
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#71
No matter who the Democratic President is, unless the Democrats control at least the Senate, the
still_one
Aug 2015
#35
Even with the Senate, the GOP House can still stop pretty much everything. The 112th congress was
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#62
Actually SC, and judicial appointments are a big deal, and set the foundation for change
still_one
Aug 2015
#75
Mid terms in Nov 2022 is the earliest since the gerrymandering cannot be fixed until after the 2020
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#58
You would be surprised how controversial that pretty obvious conclusion is. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#72
Much as I love Bernie and what he stands for, no, not with this Republican Congress. n/t
Lil Missy
Aug 2015
#80
The reality is that the Republicans' plan to take over state Houses and Senates
redstateblues
Aug 2015
#87