Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frylock

(34,825 posts)
8. How dare white "liberals" take exception to being called "liberal white supremacists"
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 05:10 PM
Aug 2015

the nerve of some people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wish folks would just let Bernie handle it. stone space Aug 2015 #1
I think it's too late. sibelian Aug 2015 #2
yep, tone deaf! BLM wants to discuss policy in 2015- the robotic response is " Marched w MLK" bettyellen Aug 2015 #3
They don't want to discuss policy AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #4
he had zip nana zilch on his website until a few days ago. while I am sure you have no idea how that bettyellen Aug 2015 #6
He has been talking about it for months in speech after speech AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #10
I guess you missed all the NEW statements and NEW content Bernie added in the last couple of weeks? bettyellen Aug 2015 #30
Because he had them on his senatorial website before. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #42
Careful now. You might disrupt their narrative. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #44
It is as if you are trying to undo any goodwill Sanders has earned in the last weeks. Interesting. bettyellen Aug 2015 #76
Huh? How so? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #79
Insulting people who vote. I thought that was a no-brainer. bettyellen Aug 2015 #80
So people who vote are immune from criticism? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #83
Insults. Try and stay with me here. Also, bizarre accusations and CTs- all alienating. bettyellen Aug 2015 #84
What kind of bizarre accusations? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #85
Says someone pushing memes and AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #102
Well why the hell would anyone look there when he had a "for president" web site? Seriously. bettyellen Aug 2015 #67
Good for him AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #106
You are imagining lots of strange things that are not true. Agony? Lol. bettyellen Aug 2015 #117
It's a NEW Campaign Armstead Aug 2015 #63
Wow. To me it was a glaring omission, but whatever. Go tell voters they should have been following bettyellen Aug 2015 #68
Not a matter of ego...A matter of not liking to see total distortions Armstead Aug 2015 #74
The info WAS missing from his campaign site. And answers like "but college and youth employment" bettyellen Aug 2015 #75
It is history....Hopefully everyone will move beyond it Armstead Aug 2015 #77
maybe give people a full week or so, LOL. bettyellen Aug 2015 #78
They're not really "new" ms liberty Aug 2015 #105
Not true. tblue Aug 2015 #81
on his website, not "on his sight". Listening matters. Just as when people ask about racial justice today bettyellen Aug 2015 #82
"They just want to throw stink bombs instead." NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #9
Nonsense, since BS announced his campaign giftedgirl77 Aug 2015 #37
Absolute nonsense AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #39
This poster showed up here in May TM99 Aug 2015 #57
Yup. Agschmid Aug 2015 #64
That poster should be banned. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #65
1-6 to leave this post. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #95
That got an alert? Seriously? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #99
The whole point is he has been fighting for peoples rights Alittleliberal Aug 2015 #58
That is flat out untrue, and if your ageist self had a clue, you'd know it. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #86
You don't discuss policy by demanding someone bow down before you.. frylock Aug 2015 #7
They had their chance to discuss AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #40
that is largely not response. but many of you hill devotees like to push false memes cali Aug 2015 #23
I am not a Hil devotee by any means. LOL, those sort of assumptions are just foolish. bettyellen Aug 2015 #26
Yep, that's me, a radical entirely intolerant of racism BainsBane Aug 2015 #5
How dare white "liberals" take exception to being called "liberal white supremacists" frylock Aug 2015 #8
Especially hearing it from a white liberal herself! artislife Aug 2015 #98
I don't think anybody had you in mind. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #11
True, no one was thinking of Bain. eom artislife Aug 2015 #13
I stand with them 100 percent BainsBane Aug 2015 #21
Okay, cool. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #22
So these guys are no good then? BainsBane Aug 2015 #92
They're cool with me. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #93
What's the difference? BainsBane Aug 2015 #94
I don't remember reading about George Washington... NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #96
The Boston Tea Party wasn't polite BainsBane Aug 2015 #103
And you are comparing literally apples and hazelnuts here nadinbrzezinski Aug 2015 #108
Apples and oranges. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #109
That isn't the point BainsBane Aug 2015 #113
Like you, I'm a Hillary Clinton supporter. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #114
You can't save them... haikugal Aug 2015 #110
of course you do, but then you defend farrakhan cali Aug 2015 #25
by the defitions you are using, you have no right to have an opinion, let alone speak for them nadinbrzezinski Aug 2015 #33
^^^this. artislife Aug 2015 #100
you're a white liberal ibegurpard Aug 2015 #12
Yup nt artislife Aug 2015 #15
You noticed that too, eh? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #24
Normally the White Savior Narrative is saved for movies Capt. Obvious Aug 2015 #32
Zing! romanic Aug 2015 #47
Yep. I've called her out on it. She feels she has the right to speak for black people. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #71
I always chuckle at your self perception Capt. Obvious Aug 2015 #31
Why would you possibly imagine that is of any interest to me? BainsBane Aug 2015 #89
Except you're a fan of Louis Farrakhan, a virulent homophobe, racist and anti-Semitic. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #45
How interesting. I hadn't seen that before. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #46
Honestly, I wouldn't take that too seriously. I think she is just trying to burnish her "radical" Romulox Aug 2015 #70
Trust me I don't. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #116
You're no radical; you are for Hillary, the candidate of the Status Quo. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #69
I understand it's unforgivable BainsBane Aug 2015 #88
A "radical" is someone who challenges entrenched power, not one who defends it. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #90
^^^THIS^^^THIS^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #115
I am intolerant of sexual predators LeftOfWest Aug 2015 #119
Not really surprising that you're here attacking the "radical" BLM protestors. DanTex Aug 2015 #14
My second favorite group is Pets. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #16
GASP! sibelian Aug 2015 #49
Worthy of the fainting couch to be sure. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #50
I just about made it over to the chaise longue sibelian Aug 2015 #52
Beer...the cause of and solution to all problems. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #54
Oh yeah, I forgot. The NRA and Liberty U are good, and "black radicals" are bad. DanTex Aug 2015 #51
Huh? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #53
Gosh, that's ME rumbled. sibelian Aug 2015 #55
No one is buying what you're selling. Alittleliberal Aug 2015 #59
Ah, complexity. Truly bizarre that a Bernie supporter would want to bring up that topic. DanTex Aug 2015 #60
And here we go again with criticizing Alittleliberal Aug 2015 #61
However shall we muddy-faced fools navigate this *infernal labyrinth*? sibelian Aug 2015 #62
Bernie supporters are incapable of complexity? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #66
As if you yourself aren't simply a Hillary partisan making hay of this matter. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #73
While the cause is critically important, the tactics are backfiring whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #17
at some point, people will inevitably ask 'if they're this beligerent to a long time civil rights' HFRN Aug 2015 #28
I guess some would ask that, but I wouldn't whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #29
it is taboo here to say anything about BLM that carries even a hint of criticism cali Aug 2015 #18
Yes, I've gotten that impression. NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #19
I am gay and am highly critical of how Human Rights Campaign m-lekktor Aug 2015 #20
Thanks for that. Great post. TexasMommaWithAHat Aug 2015 #27
well-said Vattel Aug 2015 #35
People conveniently forget the tension between LGBTers and our "official" movement Prism Aug 2015 #36
Thank you. QC Aug 2015 #41
Well spoken. sibelian Aug 2015 #56
That's by and large been my biggest JackInGreen Aug 2015 #107
"Are harsh, intolerant, self-indulgent radicals trying to hijack Seattle?" OilemFirchen Aug 2015 #34
Other than the WTO debacle, what specifically are you referring to? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #48
I think Black Bloc is enough, OilemFirchen Aug 2015 #118
Keep it up. nt Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #38
Keep what up? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #43
We need to follow example JackInGreen Aug 2015 #72
Look d_r Aug 2015 #87
"you even have some that think it was nothing more than rude self-absorbed behavior" NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #91
The event disruptors shut down in Seattle was a protect Social Security and Medicare type event, Zorra Aug 2015 #97
except, young economically privileged disruptors don't understand that the rest of us nashville_brook Aug 2015 #111
• This answers the question ... FraDon Aug 2015 #101
This is petty JackInGreen Aug 2015 #104
Bwahaha! An "intern at The Stranger"??? TheSarcastinator Aug 2015 #112
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Are harsh, intolera...»Reply #8