Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns? [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)124. dems agreed to not put up a viable candidate and he agreed to vote with dems. just giving you
the facts. works for me. i do not sit in outrage over political negotiations and deals.
win win win
all you accomplished was having me waste my time reiterating what i have already said.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
216 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He has to win the votes in order to get the delegates, not sure if he can get enough.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2015
#2
no. he has not. he has gained SOME dems, repugs, teabaggers, independents and libertarians.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#14
lol. well, i disagree with your nope. meh.... we would need stats on the crowd and party
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#112
The fact is that the things Bernie talks about are American issues not liberal or conservative ones
Fearless
Aug 2015
#132
all the repugs know one woman and cares for one woman, and women are still being fucked by them.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#133
i agree mostly. but then i do not have issues with clinton and omalley so i can also recognize
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#136
Welcome to Du, why do you keep accusing posters of "wanting" him to run as an independent?
uppityperson
Aug 2015
#106
yes. in 1990 to win, he made a deal with dems for his vote. a deal is a deal, right?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#15
first... ha ha ha. second. i do approve of sanders, as a senator. not a fan as a president.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#54
the funny you do not get is the hypocrisy of the sander supporter that i did not want to get into
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#62
Just yell socialist. Please provide example Bernie is not in line with democratic party
daybranch
Aug 2015
#87
This is Democratic Underground -a good assumption is that we are all Democrats.Are you a republican?
NRaleighLiberal
Aug 2015
#97
I love the argument that if Sanders beats, arguably, the strongest candidate..
frylock
Aug 2015
#125
We are all supporters of the Party. We are the UNDERGROUND of the party.
Alittleliberal
Aug 2015
#98
The country is not in the center on the issues. Issue poll after issue poll shows that.
Alittleliberal
Aug 2015
#103
I didn't realize I was attacking you personally. I'm very sorry you are so upset.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#139
Hell, I say something nasty about the Democratic party and the sell outs running it nearly every day
dflprincess
Aug 2015
#154
1990, he kept losing as independent, he made a deal with dem party. no viable opponent for his vote.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#13
i have not put in the time, nor would i, with this attack on iraq vote. i think
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#47
Are you trying to tell us that a sitting senator and former congressman and mayor is a POLITICIAN?!
Qutzupalotl
Aug 2015
#99
Commenting to link back here when I here more "Bernie is not a politician" posts. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#104
i am not hunting it down, and ya... i hear it used from supporters. not my reality or expectation.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#37
and that would be the consistent pragmatic person i am. so when i hear people rant about compromise
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#43
i am clueless what answer you want me to give or what you are talking about.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#110
dems agreed to not put up a viable candidate and he agreed to vote with dems. just giving you
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#124
In 1990, he had alread won the Mayoral election as an Independent 4 times. Each time
Luminous Animal
Aug 2015
#94
yes. he lost many running for the socialist party. and lost the first run for congress
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#117
he is running as independent under dems as he ran in vermont. he is merely using the dems for votes
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#19
there are many things i respect about sanders. this is one of them. along with his consistent
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#111
so we throw all the congressional democrats under the bus, the prez, clinton and all her supporters.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#22
Those congressional Democrats have constituents he needs to win in those States.
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#188
True. He doesn't risk losing any support because he never had any to begin with.
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#203
we need to start local, and get in thru out our states, then.... we can start having more say
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#205
i read your discussion on endorsements elsewhere. i thought very interesting. just another piece
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#208
All of those items you've mentioned requires support in the Senate and in Congress as a whole.
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#179
true, we havent really talked about this, but the other day, that is the answer i got. REVOLUTION
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#183
it isnt possible. sanders is hitting one group. white middle and working class. he is dependent on
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#186
And he and his supporters will realize, too late, that Repubs, Indies, and
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#189
here in texas, one would have to change party and vote in just one primary. i do not know
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#191
They're not going to vote for him. They're just propping him up to make it appear as if
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#193
i dont know the reason, intent, motive.... but i bottom line agree with you.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#194
amazing that people would choose truth and representation, over obedience to a party
HFRN
Aug 2015
#39
when you create snaders as a savior, as you very well did in a post above, one might challenge
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#50
No it isn't. Please stop acting as if there is something unhealthy about Bernie's campaign.
Ken Burch
Aug 2015
#128
firstly, huh? unhealthy? ok. secondly, savior, why did you turn it to messiah. save = savior
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#130
personally i think it is atrocious that a party i have been a part of forever need this "save"
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#140
i didnt say it was about me as a person. a party i am proud of and have participated for a lifetime
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#142
ya. and yet sanders himself says he is not a democrat or liberal and his supporters argue
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#58
ok, so? he is a socialist. a democratic leaning socialist. he is an independent. your point?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#109
+1. Lots of people have told me that they didn't leave the party; the party left them.
winter is coming
Aug 2015
#75
So eliminating the "Nader" possibility is good as long as it isn't Bernie doing it?
Fearless
Aug 2015
#70
He doesn't want to win the party. He wants to win the people. The human people, not
valerief
Aug 2015
#76
I don't love the Democratic Party, myself. It seems to have taken a hard right turn.
djean111
Aug 2015
#77
Bill Clinton spent his whole post-1980 career scorning nearly everything this party stands for-
Ken Burch
Aug 2015
#92
Not with the highest national polling sitting at 30% that dropped from 33"
FloridaBlues
Aug 2015
#108
You and Politocrap are confused about the difference between the Democratic Party and Democrats.
Agony
Aug 2015
#114
But he declined the Democratic nomination in those Senate runs. You neglected to mention that.
hrmjustin
Aug 2015
#161
First off, he should join the party officially if he desires the nomination.
Dawson Leery
Aug 2015
#169
The political parties are a bug not a feature for self governance and power centered on the people.
TheKentuckian
Aug 2015
#172
"preachy, screeching and liar". and you are talking about another duers posts?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#180