Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Endorsements are consistently predictive of who becomes the nominee....Bernie Sanders has zero [View all]Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)22. Just out of curiosity
When did this talking point come out? Was it two days ago or three?
TIA
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Endorsements are consistently predictive of who becomes the nominee....Bernie Sanders has zero [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2015
OP
yes....but actual votes are probably the most predictive of who will win
virtualobserver
Aug 2015
#32
That's nice but these are super delegates who add to the 4100 needed for nomination
yeoman6987
Aug 2015
#69
Are you a member of congress or Senator? Do you work with Sanders on a day to day basis?
Gothmog
Aug 2015
#90
His fellow Senator from Vermont, Patrick Leahy, has already endorsed Hillary. nt
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2015
#10
So in others words they will imitate the R's behavior toward President Obama. Ok, got it. nt
Mnemosyne
Aug 2015
#36
Is pretty strange, isn't it? The people who havve worked with him, dont want him
lunamagica
Aug 2015
#19
The Clintons are famous for holding a grudge. Sanders is famous for not holding grudges.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#52
This is exactly what I was thinking. These early endorsements are for position
aikoaiko
Aug 2015
#65
No, they know him, and they've already publicly endorsed Clinton. The horse has left the barn.
MADem
Aug 2015
#48
If the establishment "hates the Bern," then why did the Bern ask to be included under the
MADem
Aug 2015
#62
He IS a guest in the DNC's home. If he were a member of the family, he'd have run as a
MADem
Aug 2015
#72
Maybe you should "please stop doing that" --you know, accusing people of "claiming exclusion"
MADem
Aug 2015
#77
And 'cause the Democrats are weinees!! No worse -- CORPORATISTS beholden to TPTB
Number23
Aug 2015
#96
Wanna see the party implode? Let super delegates go against the will of the people....
Joe the Revelator
Aug 2015
#109
Because the person I'm arguing the point with switches position based on the subject.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#87
Maybe the solution is to stick with what Hillary actually did, and what she actually said.
MADem
Aug 2015
#97
I don't blame them, considering the current front runner keeps a list of political enemies.
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#20
Why are you spewing right-wing conspiracy theories? This is to what I'm referring:
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#37
as the hubby of a former nurse, good for you - nurses are among the true heroes of
NRaleighLiberal
Aug 2015
#50
They need to do another chart on this: Federal indictments are consistently predictive of who
Purveyor
Aug 2015
#40
Sooo...based on that "logic" she should have been the nominee in 08 as well.
progressoid
Aug 2015
#51
Historically, you're right, but how much in this election season has beenthe same as
napi21
Aug 2015
#57
There is no reason to believe that Bernie is a historic and paradigm changing candidate
hack89
Aug 2015
#81
Skin color was a pretty solid indicator of who would be elected president until 2008.
last1standing
Aug 2015
#83