Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Endorsements are consistently predictive of who becomes the nominee....Bernie Sanders has zero [View all]Vinca
(54,009 posts)117. So look at those 2008 lines again and tell me who's in the White House.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Endorsements are consistently predictive of who becomes the nominee....Bernie Sanders has zero [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2015
OP
yes....but actual votes are probably the most predictive of who will win
virtualobserver
Aug 2015
#32
That's nice but these are super delegates who add to the 4100 needed for nomination
yeoman6987
Aug 2015
#69
Are you a member of congress or Senator? Do you work with Sanders on a day to day basis?
Gothmog
Aug 2015
#90
His fellow Senator from Vermont, Patrick Leahy, has already endorsed Hillary. nt
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2015
#10
So in others words they will imitate the R's behavior toward President Obama. Ok, got it. nt
Mnemosyne
Aug 2015
#36
Is pretty strange, isn't it? The people who havve worked with him, dont want him
lunamagica
Aug 2015
#19
The Clintons are famous for holding a grudge. Sanders is famous for not holding grudges.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#52
This is exactly what I was thinking. These early endorsements are for position
aikoaiko
Aug 2015
#65
No, they know him, and they've already publicly endorsed Clinton. The horse has left the barn.
MADem
Aug 2015
#48
If the establishment "hates the Bern," then why did the Bern ask to be included under the
MADem
Aug 2015
#62
He IS a guest in the DNC's home. If he were a member of the family, he'd have run as a
MADem
Aug 2015
#72
Maybe you should "please stop doing that" --you know, accusing people of "claiming exclusion"
MADem
Aug 2015
#77
And 'cause the Democrats are weinees!! No worse -- CORPORATISTS beholden to TPTB
Number23
Aug 2015
#96
Wanna see the party implode? Let super delegates go against the will of the people....
Joe the Revelator
Aug 2015
#109
Because the person I'm arguing the point with switches position based on the subject.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#87
Maybe the solution is to stick with what Hillary actually did, and what she actually said.
MADem
Aug 2015
#97
I don't blame them, considering the current front runner keeps a list of political enemies.
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#20
Why are you spewing right-wing conspiracy theories? This is to what I'm referring:
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#37
as the hubby of a former nurse, good for you - nurses are among the true heroes of
NRaleighLiberal
Aug 2015
#50
They need to do another chart on this: Federal indictments are consistently predictive of who
Purveyor
Aug 2015
#40
Sooo...based on that "logic" she should have been the nominee in 08 as well.
progressoid
Aug 2015
#51
Historically, you're right, but how much in this election season has beenthe same as
napi21
Aug 2015
#57
There is no reason to believe that Bernie is a historic and paradigm changing candidate
hack89
Aug 2015
#81
Skin color was a pretty solid indicator of who would be elected president until 2008.
last1standing
Aug 2015
#83