2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Critique of HRC From Bernie Supporters Shouldn't Lead to the Phrase 'You Sound Like A Republican!" [View all]Lancero
(3,284 posts)On Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:43 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
sanders is courting repug, libertarians, teabaggers and populist. they want the right to criticize
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=533400
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
accusing a candidate of collaborating with republicans, tea party, and libertarians
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:56 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While I think the post is delusional, because all candidate will be courting voting groups outside of their bailiwick, Sander is "courting", not collaborating. I would take more issue with the premise that any criticism, no matter how valid, is a RW talking point.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disruptive shit stirring against a Democratic Candidate.
The more our party fights amongst itself, the greater the odds of a Republican winning - So, lets keep the hitposts against D canidates shelved and work towards putting a Democrat - Be it Hillary or Bernie, we'll let the general election decide - in the White House.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is unfortunately a true statement. It is within the DU TOS and community standards. No reason to alert, much less hide.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given