Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I've got two questions for those supporitng HRC [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)79. Exactly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Policy that wasn't established until AFTER she left STATE. Your concern is touching, though.... nt
MADem
Aug 2015
#53
The Cons are responsible for turning the server into a political issue. Her actions were not illegal
Metric System
Aug 2015
#34
Yeah, let's' just accept the fact that fabricated distractions should disqualify a fully qualified candidate?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#54
Always glad to see candidates who don't disparage foreigners and minorities in general.
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#5
Just glad to see candidates who don't disparage Latinos, Indians, etc., to attract votes.
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#8
When someone posts photos of Indians, Latinos, Blacks, etc., to attract the fear/greed vote,
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#12
In this case, some folks use "corporatism" as a guise for outright bigotry/xenophobia/greed.
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#14
if you and trump both said the sky was partly cloudy, would that make YOU a 'bigot'?
HFRN
Aug 2015
#15
Xenophobia has to be covered up by something else....obviously. Those supporting that deceit are willfully blind.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#55
Concern over taking jobs from Americans so corps can pay foreign workers lower wages..
frylock
Aug 2015
#59
"Concern". Word of the day......Anyone can vote for Trump and sign up for his police state....free country!
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#60
it's unfortunate that you find a few fuck bombs more offensive than people losing their jobs
frylock
Aug 2015
#69
Yet, you'd take a job from an Indian, Hispanic, Asian, etc., or disparage them like Trump.
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#70
It astounds me why, given the Republicans' propensity to gin up "scandals" instead of
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2015
#85
Amnesia is the best weapon in the limited arsenal of those attacking Clinton with thin gruel.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#56
penalize clinton throwing her to the side cause she dares to be a woman/a clinton? reward the pigs?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#32
you may not have said anything, but i did say it. why she is attacked like no other. nt
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#50
you betcha.... ;) . as the great sanders says... some of it is sexist. I don’t know that a man woul
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#81
dont care. i do not care what your counter is. that has nothing to do with dumping a woman cause
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#83
Republicans did not just "yammer" about racism, they actively practised it and focused on Obama
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#68
Damn, looks like Hillary has picked up more supporters, huh. Interesting, maybe even a few
Thinkingabout
Aug 2015
#76
When this is all over she will be stronger than ever. Our candidates rock!! nt
kelliekat44
Aug 2015
#78