Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I'm sorry, this does NOT look to me like a "battle-tested candidate" who can "withstand scrutiny" [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)51. "hit on a Republican"? None of them are my type, plus I'm married.
Seriously, this forum is called GD: Primaries. Were it called GD: General, you might have a point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sorry, this does NOT look to me like a "battle-tested candidate" who can "withstand scrutiny" [View all]
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
OP
then she should demonstrate what a fucking awesome candidate she is, and shut it down properly.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#35
When has Bernie spoken to anyone? All he does is talk AT people, or shrivel up in a corner....
George II
Aug 2015
#53
Well Fawke, I see you're still dwelling on that "9000" event from about a month ago, huh?
George II
Aug 2015
#61
WTH.....you use BLM protest in Seattle against Sanders making fun of a 73 year old man
ALBliberal
Aug 2015
#65
Well, your thread was crafted to create a kerfluffle. And I think you got what you expected,
MADem
Aug 2015
#47
I would love it if she started dealing with these things "like a pro". She's not.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#48
I think she's doing just fine. I thought those jokes were the clean way of doing the
MADem
Aug 2015
#52
I think it's funny that me posting links from the WaPo is a "kerfluffle"
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#54
So ignore the damn thread. This isn't LBN, with some sort of 12 hour clock ticking on shit.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#59
it certainly seems like some people would like this story to go away.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#69
Clinton was being sarcastic, more than the idiotic mass media deserve.....sigh......not to mention this is warming over a cold story.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#3
So the fact the FBI is investigating a possible crime has nothing to do with it?
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2015
#37
Sure, that must be it! If you SAW the event and her tone of voice....you would probably still say
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#74
I notice both responses so far are about you, not addressing the content of your post.
cyberswede
Aug 2015
#6
because cyber, as a democrat, i do not take a fox news reporter seriously. should i?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#8
It's still a flippant reply...that will be played over and over once she's the nominee.
cyberswede
Aug 2015
#19
one of the things we brag about sanders is his flippant replies to stupid. i have no problem with it
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#20
The article is from the Washington Post, as is Ruth Marcus's commentary.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#43
Why would anyone in their right mind give an ounce of respect to a Fox fascist plant?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#12
"Why would anyone at DU use a Fox News plant to attack a Democratic Party leader" right. why? nt
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#15
Honestly, if she did that, it would move my marker a bunch of notches more towards supporting her.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#41