Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Anatomy of a Hillary Clinton pseudo-scandal: How Republicans and their media lackeys are .... [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)45. not my job to
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anatomy of a Hillary Clinton pseudo-scandal: How Republicans and their media lackeys are .... [View all]
DonViejo
Aug 2015
OP
No, it's like some folks have no idea how the classified information system works
jeff47
Aug 2015
#11
Knowing this, she recklessly accommodates them by providing ammunition. <nt>
AtomicKitten
Aug 2015
#4
makes as much sense and for the same reasoning, as this manufactured outrage of email
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#37
oh please, all of the democratic party has known since 90's that the gop manufactures their outrage,
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#39
it is all nonsense. we agree. i see you do choose to be one of those sanders supporters.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#41
"if the person being discussed were “competent,” it wouldn’t be “out there” in the first place"
L0oniX
Aug 2015
#20
yes... lets reward the dishonest, you know rw smear... witha smear. brilliant
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#30
No question about it, and I suspect they are very concerned about running against Hillary
still_one
Aug 2015
#26