Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: OMFG [View all]

Gore1FL

(22,951 posts)
21. My concern is that it reflects poor decision making.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 09:37 AM
Aug 2015

There was a profound lack of concern over data security. On top of it all, it was an elective mistake--they actually had to proactively make this blunder.

If she is the Dem nominee, I will vote for her.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OMFG [View all] boston bean Aug 2015 OP
There are lots of good reasons to not want Hillary as POTUS. Her email server isn't one of them. Scuba Aug 2015 #1
Logical persons like yourself are not the subject target. Amimnoch Aug 2015 #15
+1000 blackspade Aug 2015 #22
Where have I seen this before? Doingto @ 9:15AM. Yet, it's the copy OP that gets the attention. nt TheBlackAdder Aug 2015 #34
Agreed. Not a fan. But the Republicans are just being dickish morons as usual. If a Republican GoneFishin Aug 2015 #49
I've weighed in very little on the email scandal, but what I do think is that Vinca Aug 2015 #2
POTUS suddenly promoting Biden is all over Fox news leftofcool Aug 2015 #3
In a nutshell, all Obama said was basically Biden would be a good President.... George II Aug 2015 #14
And we know (or at least I hope we know) that Fox knows that riversedge Aug 2015 #46
Have you seen what they have done with them since she released them? BooScout Aug 2015 #4
I know. So wouldn't it have been better long, long ago, Vinca Aug 2015 #8
You make it seem the RW investigation committee had no power over the timing. nt boston bean Aug 2015 #10
This is why I would have been better off not commenting. Vinca Aug 2015 #45
Wish I could agree with you, but I'm not sure I can. beerandjesus Aug 2015 #16
Your main concern is debunked here: boston bean Aug 2015 #5
Question heather blossom Aug 2015 #6
This is a point, i think most miss. boston bean Aug 2015 #7
Good question! leftofcool Aug 2015 #11
Did she also mix her personal email on the same account, morningfog Aug 2015 #9
+1 RiverLover Aug 2015 #12
Clinton camp? The source for this article is an IG report. Metric System Aug 2015 #18
BENGHAZI! George II Aug 2015 #13
I agree with C. Powells words about the worse Rs, "fucking crazies". Your "stupendously ridiculous" Sunlei Aug 2015 #17
Of course the Right-Wing crazies on Twitter are making the most of this, which is why it's so Metric System Aug 2015 #19
and rtracey Aug 2015 #20
My concern is that it reflects poor decision making. Gore1FL Aug 2015 #21
My concern is that a full fledged right wing smear campaign boston bean Aug 2015 #23
I was speaking as an IT professional, not a "self purported Democrat." n/t Gore1FL Aug 2015 #51
Ignoring decades of good decision making.... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #24
Choosing not to ignore poor decisions is not the same as ignoring good ones. n/t Gore1FL Aug 2015 #50
Some you win, some you lose, are we not all human? Demanding perfection is conceding failure. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #52
Fair point. Gore1FL Aug 2015 #57
From your lips to all Democratic Party voters ears....and ballots. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #59
Aw Shits and Attagirls. Look into 'em. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #54
Actually have not from the beginning paid a lot of attention to this email manufactured investigatio EV_Ares Aug 2015 #25
To the best of my knowledge Caroline Kennedy isn't running for anything tularetom Aug 2015 #26
I don't care AT ALL about email-gate. BUT, it will be used against Hillary by the GOP. djean111 Aug 2015 #27
Make sure you skip over the part where Kennedy didn't send classified. jeff47 Aug 2015 #28
Who knows at this point it's early. She may have boston bean Aug 2015 #29
No, they were retroactively marked. Not retroactively classified. jeff47 Aug 2015 #30
lol boston bean Aug 2015 #32
The rules about classified information say the entity who creates the classified jeff47 Aug 2015 #37
uh huh... you keep on truckin! nt boston bean Aug 2015 #38
I apologize that reality is not conforming to your political views. (nt) jeff47 Aug 2015 #39
Sounds like something I could have said in return. nt boston bean Aug 2015 #41
But you didn't. Jeff47 did, and he directed the statement at you. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2015 #53
They appear to have reclassified at least one... Sancho Aug 2015 #56
No, it was originally given as unmarked. jeff47 Aug 2015 #58
A private email for official government business may not be the problem. Kokonoe Aug 2015 #31
Did she wipe a server? If she didn't, obviously she had nothing to hide. n/t Skwmom Aug 2015 #33
Wouldn't you wipe a server if you're done with it and have no more use for it? Metric System Aug 2015 #35
do you mean.... Sivart Aug 2015 #36
I certainly would if there were subpoenas and FOIA requests for emails on it morningfog Aug 2015 #44
No AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #48
You know of course that the server was backed up... Sancho Aug 2015 #55
... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #40
Certainly there were Republicans who did the same thing--why isn't the media going after them? WI_DEM Aug 2015 #42
According to the article the two aren't comparable madville Aug 2015 #43
Also Caroline didn't have/use her own server at home. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»OMFG»Reply #21