Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Rasmussen: Romney ahead by 15 in North Dakota [View all]Jack Sprat
(2,500 posts)4. Rosanna Lopez. I have not seen
you post anything positive for President Obama or the Democratic Party as a whole. Maybe it's just coincidence that I only see your negative forecasts and don't notice your positive ones, but your posts don't ever seem to indicate anything but rain and storms.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yet nationally Obama is ahead by 6 percent I believe. North Dakota????? Please...n/t
monmouth
Jul 2012
#26
You are incorrect on so many levels. And why are you quoting Karl Rove and asking us to buy it?
MADem
Jul 2012
#78
Yeah, the tweet reads "we live in a Canada" It's pretty clear. n/t
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#139
If it's a rw poll, don't you think they should have Romney doing better? this looks good for Obama,
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#90
If you know anything about Rasmussen, as I do from observation over the years, he tends to bullshit
MADem
Jul 2012
#95
I think realclearpolitics has a right wing leaning along with Rasmussen organization. So I
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#115
You noticed that too? Not only that, but tends to question polls showing the president's leads.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#62
Considering the population of N. Dakota, that isn't percentage points, it is actual voters.
CBGLuthier
Jul 2012
#3
I find these attacks on you in this thread inexcusable. Your point is eminently clear, that if
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#32
I'm not much of a Twitterer. (I don't really understand what the point is.) But
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#39
All I see from your twitter feed is that it is all recent, you have an usual interest in Canadian
MADem
Jul 2012
#93
WTF? You can't have it both ways. Cast asparagus about a twitter feed yet have it prove nothing.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#116
You may beg my pardon but you can't have it both ways. Your conclusion is it proves something yet
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#120
I understand and agree it is odd. My only point is you can't both claim it proves and it doesn't
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#123
Uppity, I never said anything proved anything--in fact, I simply pointed out a few
MADem
Jul 2012
#143
So nearly 40% of union households voted for Scott Walker because they were "disappointed"...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#69
useless poll from right wingers .... sampling is small and all republicants ....
MindMover
Jul 2012
#51
I think Rasmussen only overstates Republicans strength in key battleground states.
DCBob
Jul 2012
#77
I thought Romney would be doing better there and since he isn't that is great.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#85
definitely a bad number for Romney -- no repub has pulled under 50% there since Dole
fishwax
Jul 2012
#89