Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(150,498 posts)
19. It's an interesting question, and one I hope will be asked.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 12:17 PM
Aug 2015

I'd like to hear his explanation. Now, many people change their views on such things as they get older, so it would also be important to get a clear explanation of his current thinking about warfare.

Many people do not understand what being a Conscientious Objector requires. It's a very specific set of beliefs, and has been tested in the SCOTUS. Perhaps Bernie Sanders understood the requirement for CO status at the time. If so, it would be interesting to hear how and why his positions on warfare have changed since then.

On the other hand, I knew several people who applied for CO status during the VN War. Only one of those was an actual pacifist, as far as I was able to tell. The others were only pretending to be. They were attempting to avoid military service through a ruse. I could not do such a thing, nor could I flee to Canada. So, I enlisted in the Air Force when my draft notice was imminent. I was not alone in taking that option, either.

I remember being called a "draft dodger" once by an Army guy in a bar. He also said, "Air Force Sucks." I agreed with him on both counts. I'm an honest guy. I enlisted in the USAF to avoid being drafted into the Army. There was also much about the USAF that did, indeed, suck, too. The Army guy was puzzled by my response, so I bought him a beer and we talked about his family.

It would be interesting to hear where Bernie's thinking was at that time. There were many approaches to an unjust and useless war in Viet Nam. I'd like to hear his.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NEWSFLASH: Nobody cares. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #1
Then why so many threads on it? Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #2
It's one of Hillaryite themes for the day. earthside Aug 2015 #3
Anybody saying Bernie was a CO during Vietnam is lying. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #4
So he tried but failed MaggieD Aug 2015 #5
He did not meet the requirements. They are pretty stringent. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #7
He has NEVER been pro-war, MaggieD. senz Aug 2015 #17
Sure he has.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #21
That vote on 9/14/2001 authorized defense against the 9/11 attackers. senz Aug 2015 #22
So why pretend he is anti-war? MaggieD Aug 2015 #23
No Commander in Chief would be prima facie "anti-war." senz Aug 2015 #25
Great post! But you're making the common mistake of taking this poster seriously. arcane1 Aug 2015 #26
I would love to have a CO as CiC awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #36
OH it will come up. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #30
He did apply for CO status, however. MineralMan Aug 2015 #6
Most CO applications are rejected. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #8
That's true. MineralMan Aug 2015 #13
He stopped being eligible for the draft on September 8, 1967. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #15
It's an interesting question, and one I hope will be asked. MineralMan Aug 2015 #19
Awesome, I guess I can start putting that I applied to Harvard on my job applications. bobbobbins01 Aug 2015 #18
Uh, you're welcome to do as you please, as far as I'm concerned. MineralMan Aug 2015 #20
Has no bearing on my vote NowSam Aug 2015 #9
If he was actually a CO, I could never vote for him. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #10
Also, that was what, 45 years ago? 50? NowSam Aug 2015 #12
Agreed , kacekwl Aug 2015 #16
Bernie evolved! he is now pro war! LOL boston bean Aug 2015 #28
What? Please don't take offense, but I'm not sure what you're saying. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #31
He evolved from being a CO to what? boston bean Aug 2015 #33
^^^This^^^ NowSam Aug 2015 #35
ADDITIONAL NEWSFLASH: He also didn't vote for the Iraq war. L0oniX Aug 2015 #11
Whoop- there it is. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #37
Weird that a progressive would take a defensive position on this issue. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #14
K&R for attempting to get truth out there, MohRokTah senz Aug 2015 #24
I looked into it HassleCat Aug 2015 #27
so what ? It's not like he is attacking people for not being pro war JI7 Aug 2015 #29
So he's just another guy GitRDun Aug 2015 #32
Good for him. He wouldn't kill people for LBJ or Nixon. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NEWSFLASH: Bernie Sanders...»Reply #19