Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
27. I looked into it
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 01:19 PM
Aug 2015

When I was about to be drafted, I checking into the status called AO-1. That means you object, but are willing to serve in a non-combat capacity, usually the medical or communications services. At that time, AO-1 was relatively easy to get, since the military had a need for medical and communications people, and they made no objection if somebody wanted to be AO-1. Straight up CO status was much harder, and usually required letters from religious figures, or something of that nature, confirming that the applicant had a religious or moral belief that precluded his participation in any way. At that time, however, not all wars were off limits. Some applicants were successful when they held a specific objection to the Vietnam War, not all wars. They could avoid the "all war" question by claiming it was a hypothetical, and they were not objecting to hypothetical wars, only the real war for which they were to be drafted. I don't know the success rate on this approach, but I know it worked for some applicants.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NEWSFLASH: Nobody cares. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #1
Then why so many threads on it? Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #2
It's one of Hillaryite themes for the day. earthside Aug 2015 #3
Anybody saying Bernie was a CO during Vietnam is lying. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #4
So he tried but failed MaggieD Aug 2015 #5
He did not meet the requirements. They are pretty stringent. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #7
He has NEVER been pro-war, MaggieD. senz Aug 2015 #17
Sure he has.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #21
That vote on 9/14/2001 authorized defense against the 9/11 attackers. senz Aug 2015 #22
So why pretend he is anti-war? MaggieD Aug 2015 #23
No Commander in Chief would be prima facie "anti-war." senz Aug 2015 #25
Great post! But you're making the common mistake of taking this poster seriously. arcane1 Aug 2015 #26
I would love to have a CO as CiC awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #36
OH it will come up. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #30
He did apply for CO status, however. MineralMan Aug 2015 #6
Most CO applications are rejected. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #8
That's true. MineralMan Aug 2015 #13
He stopped being eligible for the draft on September 8, 1967. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #15
It's an interesting question, and one I hope will be asked. MineralMan Aug 2015 #19
Awesome, I guess I can start putting that I applied to Harvard on my job applications. bobbobbins01 Aug 2015 #18
Uh, you're welcome to do as you please, as far as I'm concerned. MineralMan Aug 2015 #20
Has no bearing on my vote NowSam Aug 2015 #9
If he was actually a CO, I could never vote for him. MohRokTah Aug 2015 #10
Also, that was what, 45 years ago? 50? NowSam Aug 2015 #12
Agreed , kacekwl Aug 2015 #16
Bernie evolved! he is now pro war! LOL boston bean Aug 2015 #28
What? Please don't take offense, but I'm not sure what you're saying. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #31
He evolved from being a CO to what? boston bean Aug 2015 #33
^^^This^^^ NowSam Aug 2015 #35
ADDITIONAL NEWSFLASH: He also didn't vote for the Iraq war. L0oniX Aug 2015 #11
Whoop- there it is. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #37
Weird that a progressive would take a defensive position on this issue. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #14
K&R for attempting to get truth out there, MohRokTah senz Aug 2015 #24
I looked into it HassleCat Aug 2015 #27
so what ? It's not like he is attacking people for not being pro war JI7 Aug 2015 #29
So he's just another guy GitRDun Aug 2015 #32
Good for him. He wouldn't kill people for LBJ or Nixon. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NEWSFLASH: Bernie Sanders...»Reply #27