2016 Postmortem

askew

(1,464 posts)

49. She has Secret Service protection ONLY because she is a former president's wife.

Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:57 PM

Aug 2015

For Secretaries don't get lifelong Secret Service protection. You are trying to make her sound more important than she actually is. Nancy Reagan gets Secret Service protection too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking: #BlackLivesMatter Protesters Disrupt Hillary Clinton In Cleveland. [View all] Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 OP

I see one woman shouting from behind a barricade jberryhill Aug 2015 #1

Yeah true... whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #5

Hillary Clinton has secret service around her 24/7 because of who she is moobu2 Aug 2015 #6

She has Secret Service protection ONLY because she is a former president's wife. askew Aug 2015 #49

Unless things have changed GP6971 Aug 2015 #84

As much people who hate this lady I think she would need Secret Service Protection even if she bigdarryl Aug 2015 #87

I'm trying to make Hillary sound more important by moobu2 Aug 2015 #97

via the OP--BLM called it a 'disruption"... riversedge Aug 2015 #8

I don't care what anyone called it, I don't see anything being "disrupted" jberryhill Aug 2015 #43

Then for gawd's sake write to the author of the article and tell em how you feel! leftofcool Aug 2015 #72

Remarkably, I know bullshit when I see it, and have no need to report it to the bullshitter jberryhill Aug 2015 #75

LOL, that was a good one. still_one Aug 2015 #80

"I will certainly be happy to meet with you later, but I am going to keep talking." riversedge Aug 2015 #91

Thanks! Iliyah Aug 2015 #111

I looked but riversedge Aug 2015 #113

because of secret service. But for some people they need some evil conspiracy JI7 Aug 2015 #46

There's hardly anyone around the "disruptor" either jberryhill Aug 2015 #50

That's it? Get back to us when they shove her, call her names, and refuse to relinquish the mic. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #2

You really want to see Control-Z Aug 2015 #14

Then quit trying to compare the events. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #17

Doesn't make your statement about HRC Control-Z Aug 2015 #21

Oh stop. Garrett78 Aug 2015 #22

There really is no defense for the statement. Control-Z Aug 2015 #24

No defense is needed. Garrett78 Aug 2015 #26

"To suggest otherwise is either disingenuous or stupid" LondonReign2 Aug 2015 #64

It's not a statement that needs defending. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2015 #99

Oh, Garrett78, you've been here all of a week Control-Z Aug 2015 #36

My length of time posting at DU is relevant how? Garrett78 Aug 2015 #39

I'll take A.... TheFarS1de Aug 2015 #92

Wow! Dawgs Aug 2015 #52

I find it disturbing that you have no problem with a 73 year old being shoved cali Aug 2015 #23

I never saw him shoved Control-Z Aug 2015 #25

well said. ... riversedge Aug 2015 #85

who shoved Bernie? nt Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #102

lol nice try wendylaroux Aug 2015 #29

To suggest that AK was advocating shoving Vattel Aug 2015 #37

they can't because of secret service JI7 Aug 2015 #48

when was Bernie shoved? nt Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #101

Not playing this game with you. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #105

I saw the video. He stepped aside. He was not shoved. Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #106

No, you are and shame on you and the nasty AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #107

Saying he was not shoved = nasty depths? Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #108

Again...there was no shove. Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #110

Awesome! whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #3

It's also awesome when Bernie gets disrupted by BLM, right? Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #4

yuppers--an eye for an eye.. riversedge Aug 2015 #9

"I will certainly be happy to meet with you later, but I am going to keep talking." riversedge Aug 2015 #7

Good. nt Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #10

I'm delighted to put that notion to bed, especially when they're after policies like private prisons arcane1 Aug 2015 #11

I applaud and support #Blaclivesmatter protests against all candidats. Agnosticsherbet Aug 2015 #12

Why don't they protest the GOP who calls Lint Head Aug 2015 #13

see my response below randys1 Aug 2015 #31

Are they shoving her? Looks very polite. 840high Aug 2015 #15

Clinton is not even there jberryhill Aug 2015 #60

It's all part of Agenda 26. Soros and Co. planned everything out to the last detail. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #16

the attacks on transgender women especially black women is a huge problem JI7 Aug 2015 #58

Sorry ,but they didn't punch her in the face like... zappaman Aug 2015 #18

They punched Sanders in the face? Control-Z Aug 2015 #27

Sarcasm zappaman Aug 2015 #79

Thank you. Control-Z Aug 2015 #81

Link? mcar Aug 2015 #34

Nobody punched Sanders in the face. He did get shoved, though. Luminous Animal Aug 2015 #53

And people are still defending those bullies jfern Aug 2015 #70

I have no complaint RandySF Aug 2015 #19

As a Hillary supporter.... msrizzo Aug 2015 #20

Me too and she handled it well. leftofcool Aug 2015 #65

I agree with you on all your points. sheshe2 Aug 2015 #88

I know HRC is not bothered by it but I don't like it underthematrix Aug 2015 #28

What dont you like, people trying to not be killed for no reason? randys1 Aug 2015 #32

I don't like disrupting an HRC event. HRC already met with the BLM underthematrix Aug 2015 #71

I think white people and especially white politicians ought be VERY grateful this is all randys1 Aug 2015 #74

+ a gadzillion leftofcool Aug 2015 #76

Simple and to the point. Thanks. nt. SouthernProgressive Aug 2015 #116

Nothing got disrupted. Did you see the video of the "disruption" linked to the OP? jberryhill Aug 2015 #77

I did underthematrix Aug 2015 #86

Someone earlier was complaining that BLM only goes after dems, of course that isnt true randys1 Aug 2015 #30

Exactly right. Senator Tankerbell Aug 2015 #35

Plus 100 JustAnotherGen Aug 2015 #73

Yup. Its obvious black lives do not matter to Republicans. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #42

And I support their right to protest. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #33

How about passive-aggressive swipes at supporters of other candidates? aikoaiko Aug 2015 #47

I am also not going to make a fool of myself by claiming it was a conspired by one of my hrmjustin Aug 2015 #54

That would make sense in this case, but I bet your glad there isn't aikoaiko Aug 2015 #61

And I will not tell African Americans how the should feel about my candidate. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #62

Of course you won't tell African Americans how they should feel because 80+% agree with you. aikoaiko Aug 2015 #67

You think wrong. I am targeting no one. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #68

I would have had no problem with that! Let them shut every candidate down! leftofcool Aug 2015 #66

I cannot abide protesters preventing a group from assembling and speaking with one another. aikoaiko Aug 2015 #69

I can. leftofcool Aug 2015 #78

Just when she's criticized here, right? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #55

GEORGE SOROS! SonderWoman Aug 2015 #38

I never thought that Clinton wasn't potentially a target of a BLM disruption. Vattel Aug 2015 #40

What was actually disrupted? Is this like when BLM "disrupted" Obama at Selma? aikoaiko Aug 2015 #41

Well, look at that HUGE CROWD around the "disruptor" jberryhill Aug 2015 #51

I agree, something's off with this whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #63

Sure. mmonk Aug 2015 #44

I doubt this will be posted about over and over, it is a part of campaigning. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #45

Good, I hope they keep it up until something is finally done BainsBane Aug 2015 #56

Of they did and of course they will ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #57

Clinton's reaction in that video is quite revealing jberryhill Aug 2015 #59

I'm glad you thought so ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #82

Considering she's not IN the video jberryhill Aug 2015 #83

Well yes, I had noticed that but I didn't want to point it out ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #90

Apparently, they disrupted her clean outta there! jberryhill Aug 2015 #95

Quick shot at whatever/whomever she appears to be disrupting. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #89

"I don't see Hillary anywhere in the video" jberryhill Aug 2015 #96

Perhaps I should post some of my rants in the shower. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #98

That was not a disruption. romanic Aug 2015 #93

Of course they don't jfern Aug 2015 #109

Disrupting? LOL. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #94

New bleat: OilemFirchen Aug 2015 #100

The real culprits are the republicans. Why don't they disrupt their ralllys? I think they have demosincebirth Aug 2015 #103

I got it ... TheFarS1de Aug 2015 #104

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #112

All I am seeing here is two videos that don't have any apparent relationship to each other. eridani Aug 2015 #114

+1. Surely there's some video of this somewhere, even if it's just something winter is coming Aug 2015 #115

Keep fighting BLM. People are now listening. SouthernProgressive Aug 2015 #117