2016 Postmortem

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

52. Trouble In Paradise

Reply to leveymg (Original post)

Sat Aug 29, 2015, 09:37 PM

Aug 2015

eom

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN and Reuters: Inspectors General concluded Clinton emails presumed classified [View all] leveymg Aug 2015 OP

Talk about a desperate media going into the weeds to find....something, something.....strange Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #1

Is "lack of judgment" something you want in a President? forthemiddle Aug 2015 #13

Because if the "judgment" label peels off maybe the folks will buy the "arrogant" label....funny stuff. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #15

Guess what forthemiddle Aug 2015 #22

Whew! Good to know! At least I convinced someone at DU to not vote for Trump. My work on Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #24

LOL forthemiddle Aug 2015 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #55

Whitewater all over again mcar Aug 2015 #16

BENGHAZI!!11 BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #26

Well said. nt Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #49

Clinton loyalists won't believe a word of it. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #2

Clinton "loyalists" understand that allying with the propaganda of the corporate mass media is a bad move. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #4

Most people will think you are the propagandist here. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #6

The only thing "seriously damaged" has been the credibility of the corporate mass media, but Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #9

Fred, I will talk to you because you are rational. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #7

My fear is that the FBI/DoJ investigations won't be done until after she wins the primary askew Aug 2015 #18

It seems very likely the investigations will go beyond super-Tuesday HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #30

I know I am speculating Puzzledtraveller Aug 2015 #43

The relevant statute with the operative word italicized DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #3

That's Sec. 1924, a different section of the Act. See, Sec. 793, link below leveymg Aug 2015 #8

You are citing the Espionage Act and ignoring the Preamble... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #10

That section refers to different crimes as specified at subsections (a),(b) and (c) leveymg Aug 2015 #11

Precisely DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #14

You're citing from a different part of the Act. Note the different language, particularly at (f) leveymg Aug 2015 #23

Before we continue I need documentation DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #31

That's detailed in the Reuters article, linked above. leveymg Aug 2015 #34

From said article DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #35

The spokesman is at odds with the Department's own IG. Recall that both the State and IC IGs leveymg Aug 2015 #38

There is an interdepartmental dispute about classification. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #40

But, the DOJ now has a lot of leverage. Sec. 793 felony or plead down to Sec. 1924. Leverage leveymg Aug 2015 #48

BUt, but, but... HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #12

Polls show that isn't true. People are paying attention and her trustworthy #s are askew Aug 2015 #19

And polls are always, always spot on, right, askew? BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #29

Nope. They sure don't...unless they're rooting for her opponent(s). BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #28

"Screwed up email" might be omission of caps, bad spelling, and run-on sentences. leveymg Aug 2015 #32

Clinton is filthy rich, and the chosen candidate of the oligarchs, so Zorra Aug 2015 #17

You say "rich" like earned wealth accumulated by public service through a life time is a bad thing....that is what is turning a lot of folks off... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #21

Help me understand zalinda Aug 2015 #20

The issues with her use of a private, unsecured email server involve classified information leveymg Aug 2015 #27

You are misstating the law. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #33

You need to specify how you think there's a misstatement. You still haven't. leveymg Aug 2015 #36

Okay DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #37

The State Dept. made no such determination about any laws broken. That's a fallacy. leveymg Aug 2015 #39

Of course "gross negligence" is a criminal standard... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #41

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #42

No, the FBI is NOT investigating Hillary - not their A Team, their B Team, or their C Team. George II Aug 2015 #44

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #45

She is not a target. n/t ColesCountyDem Aug 2015 #46

Just her unauthorized server on which she had classified information is the target. At this point. leveymg Aug 2015 #58

Thanks for following this and doing these updates. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #47

Here are some more updates...most not mentioned on this thread... Sancho Aug 2015 #50

From a reliable source as opposed to Facebook, personal attorney, or political ally Media Matters. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #53

This report has been debunked.... Sancho Aug 2015 #54

It has not been debunked. The FBI has taken over the investigation which is still in progress. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #56

Like the links said... Sancho Aug 2015 #57

Nothing from nothing is still nothing. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #51

Trouble In Paradise cantbeserious Aug 2015 #52