Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Rasmussen: Romney ahead by 15 in North Dakota [View all]Rosanna Lopez
(308 posts)45. I agree
I'm glad to find another person who realizes this!
Not sure why a couple of people are making patronizing comments like "You do realize this is a red state, don't you?" I think it's they who don't understand the way politics, turnout, and down-ballot working corresponds to the Presidential race.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yet nationally Obama is ahead by 6 percent I believe. North Dakota????? Please...n/t
monmouth
Jul 2012
#26
You are incorrect on so many levels. And why are you quoting Karl Rove and asking us to buy it?
MADem
Jul 2012
#78
Yeah, the tweet reads "we live in a Canada" It's pretty clear. n/t
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#139
If it's a rw poll, don't you think they should have Romney doing better? this looks good for Obama,
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#90
If you know anything about Rasmussen, as I do from observation over the years, he tends to bullshit
MADem
Jul 2012
#95
I think realclearpolitics has a right wing leaning along with Rasmussen organization. So I
southernyankeebelle
Jul 2012
#115
You noticed that too? Not only that, but tends to question polls showing the president's leads.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#62
Considering the population of N. Dakota, that isn't percentage points, it is actual voters.
CBGLuthier
Jul 2012
#3
I find these attacks on you in this thread inexcusable. Your point is eminently clear, that if
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#32
I'm not much of a Twitterer. (I don't really understand what the point is.) But
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#39
All I see from your twitter feed is that it is all recent, you have an usual interest in Canadian
MADem
Jul 2012
#93
WTF? You can't have it both ways. Cast asparagus about a twitter feed yet have it prove nothing.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#116
You may beg my pardon but you can't have it both ways. Your conclusion is it proves something yet
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#120
I understand and agree it is odd. My only point is you can't both claim it proves and it doesn't
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#123
Uppity, I never said anything proved anything--in fact, I simply pointed out a few
MADem
Jul 2012
#143
So nearly 40% of union households voted for Scott Walker because they were "disappointed"...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#69
useless poll from right wingers .... sampling is small and all republicants ....
MindMover
Jul 2012
#51
I think Rasmussen only overstates Republicans strength in key battleground states.
DCBob
Jul 2012
#77
I thought Romney would be doing better there and since he isn't that is great.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#85
definitely a bad number for Romney -- no repub has pulled under 50% there since Dole
fishwax
Jul 2012
#89