2016 Postmortem

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

78. She just did an interview with Andrea Mitchell.

Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:39 PM

Sep 2015

She made the point that nothing was 'marked classified at the time', but then made a rather shocking admission - that she knew that things being marked classified at a later point in time was 'common'. Andrea completely failed to pick up on this, but if you, as SoS knew it was 'common' for things to be classified after the fact, why would you pass everything through a server not cleared to handle classified documents? Surely you'd have the logical capacity to realize that if such is 'common', and you pass many thousands of emails through that server, some of them are going to end up being classified and should not be on that sort of server.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Un-Democratic Democratic Party [View all] HomerRamone Sep 2015 OP

I agree. Strongly agree. With everything you said. djean111 Sep 2015 #1

Thanks. Posted yesterday:Martin O'Malley Slams DNC Effort To 'Rig' Party's 2016 Presidential Nominat elleng Sep 2015 #2

bradblog telling the truth, again AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #3

As always. elleng Sep 2015 #6

So Hillary can't win on the up & up so the system gets rigged. L0oniX Sep 2015 #4

She's rigging herself a Democratic loss in the GE, most likely. 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #10

Her server IT tech pleads the 5th ...makes it look like something is wrong even if it isn't. L0oniX Sep 2015 #29

I've always shied away from the email thing. meh. 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #30

+1 daleanime Sep 2015 #34

I read someone 840high Sep 2015 #39

She just did an interview with Andrea Mitchell. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #78

the party's repeatedly shown they'd rather lose to a Pub with a rightie than win with a populist MisterP Sep 2015 #45

That's why R's rig elections--because they believe they will lose if they don't cheat. Hillary shoul tblue37 Sep 2015 #16

Yep, that's exactly right MissDeeds Sep 2015 #19

In all fairness... kenfrequed Sep 2015 #38

Yes, that's all true.... but John Poet Sep 2015 #63

They're the electoral college of primaries, then. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #79

ah, they're just making damn sure she's inevitable, this time. Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #5

When there's such a huge departure on the issues facing US, with so much at stake ... 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #7

I will march with you. bvar22 Sep 2015 #20

My husband and I will, too! eom Duval Sep 2015 #47

1968. jwirr Sep 2015 #8

Yep 1968 zeemike Sep 2015 #41

I watched to and I am just shaking my head now. jwirr Sep 2015 #48

Actually, kenfrequed Sep 2015 #73

Frankly I think TPTB in the party wanted a second Reagan term. zeemike Sep 2015 #74

It boils down to integrity AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #9

Well said, AgingAmerican. Sienna86 Sep 2015 #21

If I may repeat, "It boils down to integrity." nm rhett o rick Sep 2015 #25

The DNC wants to steal an election from the people? in_cog_ni_to Sep 2015 #11

So what do we do about it? How do we force the issue? WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2015 #12

If Hillary gets the nomination through dirty tricks AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #32

Agree!! Grrrrr eom Duval Sep 2015 #33

...^ that 840high Sep 2015 #40

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #59

While I despise dirty tricks- ncjustice80 Sep 2015 #71

That sort of thinking is exactly why we keep getting Dems who are ever closer to Repubs offered up. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #80

We make a pledge AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #42

The fix is in... Liberaltalker Sep 2015 #14

Hillary's server IT tech pleads the 5th & makes the whole email thing look very bad. L0oniX Sep 2015 #28

Same thing happened in 2008. Super delegates promised ahead of primaries to support Hillary. ieoeja Sep 2015 #81

The DNC doesn't want to lose out on all of that campaign money that goes away under Dustlawyer Sep 2015 #13

+1000 who recovered?! noiretextatique Sep 2015 #55

It's Trickle Down Democracy. Some votes are more equal than regular votes. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #15

Dump Debbie Downer! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #17

If the DNC fixes this election against the will of democrats, I'm done fbc Sep 2015 #18

What has your State Party said about this? brooklynite Sep 2015 #23

If she gets the nomination AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #36

From your tone I guess you don't care if the DNC shuts down debates. The fewer debates rhett o rick Sep 2015 #43

FWIW, the role of Super Delegates has been in place for Decades... brooklynite Sep 2015 #56

Have you ever considered... AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #60

Your logic needs some help. I voted for Obama both in 2008 and 2012. rhett o rick Sep 2015 #62

Democrats don't tolerate cheating AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #24

This isn't something new. JohnnyRingo Sep 2015 #22

I think this is overblown GitRDun Sep 2015 #26

Terrible. zentrum Sep 2015 #27

Could very well happen HassleCat Sep 2015 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author yuiyoshida Sep 2015 #35

Very strong K/R 840high Sep 2015 #37

Superdelegates have been part of the process for 30 years. NWHarkness Sep 2015 #44

Impossible!! Hillary created the system!!! JoePhilly Sep 2015 #51

Hrm...if only there was a post up there that explained why this time may be different. jeff47 Sep 2015 #67

It's very democratic ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2015 #46

If they pull this unprecedented crap, Admiral Loinpresser Sep 2015 #50

Not to worry... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2015 #64

Correct. Admiral Loinpresser Sep 2015 #65

I happen to have met a few of these people ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2015 #70

Except Parliamentarian systems are much more responsive to the will of the voters than our system. Romulox Sep 2015 #69

Sen Sanders is getting people enthused that haven't been enthused for a long time. rhett o rick Sep 2015 #49

How many Bernie supporters would not overjoyed if Bernie was leading in the polls and had the Thinkingabout Sep 2015 #52

If the Party nomination is rigged Geronimoe Sep 2015 #53

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #54

Stop already! anthrob Sep 2015 #57

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #58

That has been debunked sooooooooooo man times already. ieoeja Sep 2015 #83

Cajoling superdelegates to declare so early in the cycle is the problem Babel_17 Sep 2015 #61

What DU calls 'superdelegates' are in fact unpledged delegates, this means that any support they Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #66

In other words, Party Bosses not beholden to the will of the people. nt Romulox Sep 2015 #68

Anyone who is unhappy with the Democratic Party, for whatever reason, should...... George II Sep 2015 #72

"find a party more suited to his/her liking." Purveyor Sep 2015 #76

Why wait? Lots of people have been complaining for several years, yet they've done nothing. George II Sep 2015 #82

The delegate count "brag" was a purely defensive move on Clinton's part... modestybl Sep 2015 #75

Yup. Party shenanigans to seat the establishment candidate over the people's choice Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #77

They will force a Bernie Write-In campaign. NorthCarolina Sep 2015 #84

They assumed and rightly so Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #85