Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)

16. Bullshit on the bid stuff.

Reply to CajunBlazer (Reply #15)

Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:26 PM

Sep 2015

If I wanted to build a home, I could pick the contractor of my choice and bids be damned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Drip... 'Clintons Personally Paid State Department Staffer To Maintain Server' - WaPo [View all] WillyT Sep 2015 OP

So the guy gets a WH salary AND private pay via Hillary??? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2015 #1

No. The guy did not work for the "WH." He worked for HRC. He also worked for State. MADem Sep 2015 #26

If the server belonged to the Clinton's, who should be responsible for paying for maintence? Thinkingabout Sep 2015 #2

Well, State Department protocol requires him to tell them of any other income earned - to prevent karynnj Sep 2015 #5

Where is the fricking conflict of interest? CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #17

You are NOT reading what I wrote correctly karynnj Sep 2015 #20

Sorry. you're right. I evidently misconstrued the intent behind youir post. CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #23

I read he reported one year but then just 840high Sep 2015 #28

Running the Clinton Family Server on the side presents a potential problem TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #34

Well, if State department business is running over that server jeff47 Sep 2015 #7

This is really bizarre Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2015 #3

ah, um Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #4

BENGHAZI!!!! SonderWoman Sep 2015 #6

Actually... HappyPlace Sep 2015 #9

your unending attempts to delegitimize any criticism of Hillary cali Sep 2015 #11

Pfft!...+1 Segami Sep 2015 #14

Unending attemts to tear down potential Democratic nominees on UD is counterproductive to our cause CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #18

Hillary is and never will be 840high Sep 2015 #29

If Clinton gets the nomination, maybe you will find a better candidate... CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #31

That old line again. I would 840high Sep 2015 #32

Are you a Republican? Just wondering. (n/t) CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #13

That poster supports Clinton. You failed to note sarcasm, which that post obviously was. MADem Sep 2015 #27

I wonder if this runs afoul of government contracting laws? jeff47 Sep 2015 #8

Contracting Laws?!?! Give us a break CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #15

Bullshit on the bid stuff. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #16

Exactly! (n/t) CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #19

It was State Department business. Thus it was not personal and those laws may come into play. jeff47 Sep 2015 #33

Drip, drip, f*cking drip. AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #10

It is 16 months before the election. Not to worry. CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #21

Are you kidding? AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #22

This will be old news in three month'. I assume you are supporting another candidate... CajunBlazer Sep 2015 #24

I'd rather be informed than have my head in the sand. AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #25

You are fooling yourself - her bagge will 840high Sep 2015 #30

Conflict of Interest? Naw...perish the thought...just business...absolutely above board. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #12