2016 Postmortem

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

109. So you are ok with violations of United States Law? Is that it?

Mon Sep 7, 2015, 12:53 PM

Sep 2015

And you calling me a marxist is kind of odd. Not unusual, just odd coming from you

But hey, you are special and I do not mean it in a nice way.

You are way out of your league here Fred and have no clue what I am talking about. That's ok. I am not going to post the final article here if I find that material either. After all it is well... not worth wasting my time with pure partisans who are all for breaking all kinds of laws as long as they win.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

122 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Okay MSNBC just demonstrated what's so angering about the media coverage [View all] Armstead Sep 2015 OP

Kickin' Faux pas Sep 2015 #1

It's all bread and circus. It's HIllary's turn, dammit. morningfog Sep 2015 #2

something i thought was interesting from the interview questionseverything Sep 2015 #3

She was Secretary of State. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #101

part of any gov't officials job is to keep their correspondence indefinitely questionseverything Sep 2015 #106

Didn't Cheney burn his? Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2015 #119

bushco's e mails were all "lost" by his IT guy questionseverything Sep 2015 #120

She is one of them. That's the only thing. Ron Green Sep 2015 #4

That's the definite sense Armstead Sep 2015 #5

That's it in a nutshell MissDeeds Sep 2015 #6

You're right. Unknown Beatle Sep 2015 #42

I love Rachel too, bvar22 Sep 2015 #45

Yep. She does what they tell her to do. If you heard her radio show with co-host Liz Winstead GoneFishin Sep 2015 #102

I used to really respect Rachel but now she just gets on my nerves emsimon33 Sep 2015 #50

I barely watch her anymore. glinda Sep 2015 #53

Rachel Maddow Show.... LovingA2andMI Sep 2015 #64

She got approval from above that it's okay to go after Trump. CrispyQ Sep 2015 #70

yep 840high Sep 2015 #47

Are you reading the emails too? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #11

No Armstead Sep 2015 #13

Right now finding out why this trove has 7,000 nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #15

I must admit my gosspiy side wants to read them, just too busy Armstead Sep 2015 #18

I am doing the due dilligence due to media... and shit nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #23

Keep searching....the GOP salutes you...and empty you will keep on finding. Too bad for Sand..... Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #105

Fred trust me, the GOP gives two shits over violations of the Foreign Practices Act nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #107

That....was....strange. Marxism in any version or form is not coming to America, so some more pragmatic folks are willing to settle for less. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #108

So you are ok with violations of United States Law? Is that it? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #109

No problem. No need to explain to me or others you do not mean things in a nice way! Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #111

Jury results: MerryBlooms Sep 2015 #118

Thanks, shows to me that some people will alert just on some personal attacks nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #121

Marxism? That's a strawman Armstead Sep 2015 #110

Those would be socialist stuff, good stuff, common throughout liberal socialist nations - see Europe. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #112

We used to have some of that Armstead Sep 2015 #116

Never understood how public utilities became privatized..I understand the history, but that was Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #117

Fred is fine with the violation of this nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #113

And I am I one touting the strawman!? Issue question: Would America nationalize the oil industry under a Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #114

Where exactly did you get to that conclussion? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #115

Bingo. Thanks. nm rhett o rick Sep 2015 #51

Yep one of them zeemike Sep 2015 #21

The "Donor's Team" glinda Sep 2015 #54

Eggsactly. We don't even show up on the radar. Remember the homeless we walk by all the time. LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #25

Your comment reminds me Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #104

Bernie has been one of them for 40 years....he's been inside the beltway that whole time... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #27

I think you miss my meaning of the word Ron Green Sep 2015 #30

No I havent.....he has been among THEM for 40 years.. VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #76

He hasn't been sitting at the cool kids table Armstead Sep 2015 #31

He has been caucussing with Democrats for 40 yrs.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #32

I think you're smart enough to perceive the difference Armstead Sep 2015 #36

And I think you know better... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #72

You are wasting you time. pangaia Sep 2015 #82

If Bernie were one of them, mostly. Interested in talking to the Rich and famous and not about us JDPriestly Sep 2015 #79

.................... pangaia Sep 2015 #80

Indeed VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #81

Sorry, but with off the rack clothing, mussed up hair PatrickforO Sep 2015 #33

Plus, everything he says is anti-corporate power, anti-wealth. senz Sep 2015 #62

And in 40 years, he still isn't a frickin' millionarie! CrispyQ Sep 2015 #71

And yet where is the major legislation he is VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #74

No because people like Hillary won't vote in favor of anything Fawke Em Sep 2015 #93

Awwwww...okay VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #94

We live in the most reality Wall St will allow. raouldukelives Sep 2015 #46

Thankfully....Bernie is going to ride in VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #75

Sadly, only individually can we stop it. raouldukelives Sep 2015 #97

Huh? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #99

Some believe in democracy, some in Wall St. raouldukelives Sep 2015 #100

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #7

kick Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #8

Case in point 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #9

Just curious Armstead Sep 2015 #12

Kanye West. sorry, no issues for you still. -nt- 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #14

I thought that a major economic/political theory might be too deep for them Armstead Sep 2015 #17

Kanye is who they WANT to be more important to our daily lives. PatrickforO Sep 2015 #34

K n R Puglover Sep 2015 #10

It's been an eye opener, when watching who is coming out to endorse her. SoapBox Sep 2015 #16

Yes it has. Hundreds of endorsements... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #83

I am MyNameGoesHere Sep 2015 #19

It's not a question of sour grapes when the game is rigged from the start Armstead Sep 2015 #22

They have? I thought the major malfunction VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #85

What about when the other 'team' AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #65

The purpose is for media to set the agenda for reporting. gordianot Sep 2015 #20

Yes. Additionally, culture war stories are de rigeur: Ron Green Sep 2015 #29

All they care about is attention which equals ratings which equals $$$$$ Boomerproud Sep 2015 #49

Sanders and O'Malley have both had one-on-one interviews with MSNBC oberliner Sep 2015 #24

I said they get interviewed somewhat Armstead Sep 2015 #28

But the flip side is that HRC gets savaged by the media a lot too oberliner Sep 2015 #41

You're right there....That's their sensationalist side Armstead Sep 2015 #43

SHALLOW is what the MSM is all about. Now back to the real news regarding Lindsey Lohan........ still_one Sep 2015 #26

we knew it would be cushions and flowers restorefreedom Sep 2015 #35

In this case it WAS Armstead Sep 2015 #37

it was lovely restorefreedom Sep 2015 #38

The very reason to avoid her like the plague.. raindaddy Sep 2015 #39

great post-- totally agree and the M$M is killing us Fast Walker 52 Sep 2015 #40

She was fine, but... Mike Nelson Sep 2015 #44

They don't call it "manufactured consent" . . . cer7711 Sep 2015 #48

+100 nt 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #59

Yes, the fix is in. The establishment Democrats are going to shove Queen Hillary down our throats. DrBulldog Sep 2015 #52

yup glinda Sep 2015 #56

Exactly. Andrea could not even dane herself to be in the same room with Bernie 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #60

BUT --- madamesilverspurs Sep 2015 #55

You got to be kidding Gothmog Sep 2015 #57

You're missing the point Armstead Sep 2015 #67

No, you're missing the point. There is no point to spending tons of time interviewing a non viable stevenleser Sep 2015 #77

That's bullshit...I suppose Obama should have been dismissed early Armstead Sep 2015 #91

I did not miss your point, I disagreed with it Gothmog Sep 2015 #87

We're free to disagree. But my point was... Armstead Sep 2015 #92

We can agree on a few things including that the Democrats running for POTUS are all good people Gothmog Sep 2015 #95

Kicked and recommended to the Max! Boycott MSNBC! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #58

I didn't know MSNBC talked about anything but Trump! IHateTheGOP Sep 2015 #61

MSNBC is owned by Comcast and GE. Comcast wouldn't be where it is if not for senz Sep 2015 #63

MSNBC in 2015 (and likely in 2016) = LovingA2andMI Sep 2015 #66

It is NOT media, it is Oligarch Propaganda. n/t PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #68

Really good analysis. Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #69

She's the overwhelming front runner and is being treated as such stevenleser Sep 2015 #73

And the media coverage had nothing to do with Trump being the front runner? n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2015 #78

You are confusing cause with effect. He said something outrageous and it got coverage. stevenleser Sep 2015 #122

I'm for Bernie! Screw MSNBC Joey Liberal Sep 2015 #84

K&R. Just an establishment circlejerk. n/t ion_theory Sep 2015 #86

Most of the airtime on (Comcast) MSNBC is devoted to Trump & Repukes! Case closed! dmosh42 Sep 2015 #88

Once you understand the news media, commentators are for the Republicans you will get it. rladdi Sep 2015 #89

Cut the cord abelenkpe Sep 2015 #90

Exactly Scruffy1 Sep 2015 #96

I caught a little bit of the interview JustAnotherGen Sep 2015 #98

K&R! Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #103