2016 Postmortem

Romulox

(25,960 posts)

26. ut-oh! nt

Reply to askew (Original post)

Tue Sep 8, 2015, 12:02 PM

Sep 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2nd Review Says Classified Information Was in Hillary Clinton's Email [View all] askew Sep 2015 OP

STILL a nothingburger..... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #1

That is false. She sent presumed classified materials to a non gov't person, Sid Blumenthal leveymg Sep 2015 #60

Not according to every other article I have read... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #61

What have you been reading? We are talking about 5% of the total number of emails reviewed contain leveymg Sep 2015 #64

"presumed" VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #65

"Presumed classified" is the same thing legally as "deemed classified." leveymg Sep 2015 #66

but it DOES happen.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #67

The source of "presumed classified" is a 2009 Presidential Order that impacted all agencies leveymg Sep 2015 #68

then why has she been cleared of charges? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #70

That references a federal regulation, not the 1917 Espionage Act and 2009 Presidential Order that leveymg Sep 2015 #72

read the full article... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #73

I did. It's an Oped not an article. I also read the regulation. leveymg Sep 2015 #74

Just like your nothingburger is an opinion VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #79

They were retroactively MARKED classified B/C they were not properly marked Skwmom Sep 2015 #78

and.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #2

NY Times is still lying. DURHAM D Sep 2015 #5

They did....this Poster is the one that is not recognizing it.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #9

�We maintain a principled position � no to coup�. HappyPlace Sep 2015 #7

I was just going to post this. Why is the OP so dismissive of the State Department? Metric System Sep 2015 #12

Still digging for pay-dirt in the same old holes.... revmclaren Sep 2015 #3

The NYT is not a credible source Buzz cook Sep 2015 #4

So true. nt DURHAM D Sep 2015 #6

If it isn't posted in the HRC room, it isn't credible? What's a credible source, now? leveymg Sep 2015 #62

The NYT has repeatedly Buzz cook Sep 2015 #83

Another hit piece by the NYT mcar Sep 2015 #8

and NBCnews, and Christian Science Monitor, and the CIA magical thyme Sep 2015 #38

Keep working it! zappaman Sep 2015 #10

Benghazi!!...nt SidDithers Sep 2015 #11

Well, the likeliehood that some poor sod who sent that will be ruined just surged HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #13

Blah blah blah blah blah Gman Sep 2015 #14

Very unlikely, and as I have said during on air discussions, irrelevant to the whole private email stevenleser Sep 2015 #15

Some people, including the media, are just too damn dumb DURHAM D Sep 2015 #16

beyond stupidity, the words "Clinton" and "scandal" Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #18

No. People are not stupid. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #21

Classified material didn't "make its way" to her server. Someone sent it to her. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #27

You're ignoring the storage issue. jeff47 Sep 2015 #28

You're framing this incorrectly stevenleser Sep 2015 #29

Actually, it does matter. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #30

Well, no--when it's a .gov unclassified system that either accidentally or deliberately TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #33

It changes who's fault it is. jeff47 Sep 2015 #46

Here comes Biden! Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #17

Nope. Folks have been alleging this for weeks. It doesnt make sense as I noted above. stevenleser Sep 2015 #19

I bet you a virtual Coca-Cola Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #22

Make it a diet coke and you are on! nt stevenleser Sep 2015 #23

Deal! Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #24

This board has a "samey" feeling to it. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #20

As Yogi Berra would say, "Deja vous all over again". oasis Sep 2015 #69

There's no interagency dispute--State for some reason is still trying to defend her, but TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #25

her spinning is terrible to boot. "I didn't think about email" allows only one of two possibilities: magical thyme Sep 2015 #36

Agree completely--you framed the issue well. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #39

ut-oh! nt Romulox Sep 2015 #26

They'll argue about this until doomsday HassleCat Sep 2015 #31

satellite data on NK nukes only came from one source magical thyme Sep 2015 #34

At the risk of repeating myself HassleCat Sep 2015 #37

or somebody left off the heading when they copied the data, vs copying the original source magical thyme Sep 2015 #41

Too late, but not too late HassleCat Sep 2015 #44

HRC is still very much in trouble for lesser classified email she sent and for operating an insecure leveymg Sep 2015 #76

How dare you let me send you classified info. JoePhilly Sep 2015 #32

Nailed it. emulatorloo Sep 2015 #35

If ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #51

You can't receive and store classified info or materials on non-classified systems. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #40

So you mean out of around 30,000 JoePhilly Sep 2015 #42

How much classified info did Petraeus hold on his computer or in a binder? TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #43

Patraeus GAVE the information to his GIRLFRIEND ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #45

Neither you or I know everything she received, what she may have sent, what she TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #80

No. They found 4 out of a sample of 40 emails. jeff47 Sep 2015 #47

Clinton was required to report the security breach jeff47 Sep 2015 #48

So out of 30k emails ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #50

No. 4 out of 40 emails. jeff47 Sep 2015 #53

This article says TWO emails. JoePhilly Sep 2015 #55

Two are TS/SCI. Two are SECRET. That's 4. jeff47 Sep 2015 #57

If the info came from the DNI ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #58

The emails are not verbatim copies of classified documents. jeff47 Sep 2015 #59

So info that was retyped from memory ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #63

Because the DNI says it was. jeff47 Sep 2015 #71

That batch of 30K emails was on a thumb drive kept by HRCs lawyer. Never heard they were retyped leveymg Sep 2015 #75

Regular people don't care about the damned emails! rusty fender Sep 2015 #49

Anyone with an understanding of information security is concerned. [n/t] Maedhros Sep 2015 #52

You "important smart" people are so concerned with your rusty fender Sep 2015 #81

Yes, the information should be made available to the American People via the FOIA Maedhros Sep 2015 #82

Scary Putin rusty fender Sep 2015 #84

Your post is irrelevant to the topic at hand. Maedhros Sep 2015 #85

What does this have to do with Benghazi? n/t doc03 Sep 2015 #54

Well, her only crime was breaking US Law... nt Romulox Sep 2015 #56

Yes, but we'll try to ignore that. leveymg Sep 2015 #77