Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Rodham Clinton: Hard Core Liberal . .... [View all]djean111
(14,255 posts)46. Um, are we playing political Mad Libs? This OP is about those little chart-y things
that some try to use to convince non-Hillary supporters that being for the TPP, fracking, war, h-1B visas, and cluster bombs is somehow "hardcore liberal" - it is not about who Nate Silvers thinks will win the nomination. Maybe you need to re-read the thread.
Anyway, enough of your non-sequiters for today. 'bye......................................................................
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
These newer graphs don't reallyt have a decent measurement of authoritarianism range...
cascadiance
Sep 2015
#8
Last time I looked, I knew no one who looked to Nate Silver when choosing a candidate to
djean111
Sep 2015
#41
He predicts outcomes. That is what he does. Are you choosing a candidate to support based on what
djean111
Sep 2015
#43
Um, are we playing political Mad Libs? This OP is about those little chart-y things
djean111
Sep 2015
#46