2016 Postmortem

rainbow fish

(42 posts)

59. Created by the IWR which Clinton VOTED for.

Reply to ericson00 (Reply #57)

Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:00 PM

Sep 2015

There is no excuse. And you just admitted that you donated to a war hawk.

I guess.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton Promises A MORE MUSCULAR Foreign Policy As President [View all] Segami Sep 2015 OP

Ugh, this is a strike against Hillary for me. GitRDun Sep 2015 #1

This, in itself, is a deal breaker. bvar22 Sep 2015 #14

I'm speechless Roy Rolling Sep 2015 #23

+100%! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #40

Contrast THIS with Bernie Sanders speech today. Wow, all I can say is as Bernie AND you just sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #61

She can't help but be a hawk jfern Sep 2015 #22

She just lost my vote. She might as well have said she wants more war brush Sep 2015 #30

Oh... Goody... WillyT Sep 2015 #2

No. The "goodies" are in her Thx Box. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #5

Yay! Break out the flags, caskets, and cannon fodder to put in them. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #3

Is anyone surprised? She's a neoliberal on foreign policy. AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #4

she's an unrepentant foreign policy hawk. sickening cali Sep 2015 #6

Hillary is not a war-monger!1!! Fumesucker Sep 2015 #7

This must be Bibi's "thx box". bunnies Sep 2015 #8

Can you be any more of a neocon, Hillary? CoffeeCat Sep 2015 #9

Nauseating. Trying to prove she's as 'tough' as GWBush? Heaven forbid we value DIPLOMACY. peacebird Sep 2015 #10

Maybe she can borrow his Flight Suit and Bull Horn bvar22 Sep 2015 #16

How about a smarter foreign policy that is relevant to the current century? procon Sep 2015 #11

The US should declare peace, nonviolence, and neutrality WDIM Sep 2015 #12

Ladies and Gentlemen Truprogressive85 Sep 2015 #13

War does that to a person nichomachus Sep 2015 #15

How can people not see what a disaster this woman would be hifiguy Sep 2015 #17

I have never, in my 40 years of following politics, seen FlatBaroque Sep 2015 #19

Each day she reminds me more of Richard Nixon hifiguy Sep 2015 #21

+a zillion n/t MissDeeds Sep 2015 #28

Pat Paulsen ran for longer than Hillary has.. Fumesucker Sep 2015 #31

LOL! hifiguy Sep 2015 #32

Ah, but how soon we forget Harold Stassen... Buns_of_Fire Sep 2015 #48

We are supposed to focus on the fact she would be the first woman POTUS zeemike Sep 2015 #34

I repeat it would be Maggie Thatcher hifiguy Sep 2015 #35

if you call her out you're using the woman thing and are sexist. Damn. This is so bad. roguevalley Sep 2015 #38

....because she would be the first Woman President! bvar22 Sep 2015 #50

For a number of people here hifiguy Sep 2015 #54

And that is not even a complete list. zeemike Sep 2015 #55

Dodging imaginary sniper fire... bvar22 Sep 2015 #18

over whose dead bodies Hillary ? olddots Sep 2015 #20

Soon, our long national nightmare awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #24

More "muscular" than whom?? President Obama.??? 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #25

Hillary supporters are all supportive of this. retrowire Sep 2015 #26

then draft everyone. If we're going to have war ad infinitum, lets have the draft roguevalley Sep 2015 #39

I agree. bvar22 Sep 2015 #68

"Iran will want to test the next president." Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #27

I wonder why HassleCat Sep 2015 #29

Sorry Hillary, no more warmongers. WI_DEM Sep 2015 #33

This right fucking here is why I cannot see myself enjoying in any way casting my vote for her. Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #36

This must be how she is rebooting her campaign RoccoR5955 Sep 2015 #37

The "showing more humor & heart reboot lasted about 24 hours! Divernan Sep 2015 #41

Once a Goldwater Girl, Always a Goldwater Girl PADemD Sep 2015 #42

One, two, three, four... RufusTFirefly Sep 2015 #47

God Damn I HATE her foreign policy hawkishness. nt stillwaiting Sep 2015 #43

so sorry Hillary, you've still got too much of that Goldwater dust on you. bbgrunt Sep 2015 #44

Barfo. SoapBox Sep 2015 #45

This is just one of many reasons I will NEVER vote for her. Fuddnik Sep 2015 #46

Get with it, man! You need to "evolve" your reference! Divernan Sep 2015 #53

OK, I've decided now. world wide wally Sep 2015 #49

It's a good fucking thing she'll never be the nominee as Purveyor Sep 2015 #51

Alright! More War! Katashi_itto Sep 2015 #52

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Sep 2015 #56

just gave her a donation; I don't believe in "doves vs. hawks," ericson00 Sep 2015 #57

Created by the IWR which Clinton VOTED for. rainbow fish Sep 2015 #59

You know what happens when a country is bombed by a superpower, bvar22 Sep 2015 #69

No matter how many iterations, *there's* her true self. SMC22307 Sep 2015 #58

You mean, a more "We came, we saw, he died"-ish kind of foreign policy? cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #60

So, this means Chelsea is going to enlist, right? . . . markpkessinger Sep 2015 #62

How many wars are enough for the MIC? in_cog_ni_to Sep 2015 #63

The "early invite" to Bibi is a clear slap in the face to PBO; bullwinkle428 Sep 2015 #64

To me it is remarkable kenfrequed Sep 2015 #65

I see your true colors shining through. 99Forever Sep 2015 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Sep 2015 #67

She will punch Islam right in the kisser!! AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #70