Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ouch !!! - 'The Clinton Campaign Puts The ‘Moron’ Into Oxymoron' - WaPo [View all]hifiguy
(33,688 posts)43. So true.
And the echoes of the last individual this fixated on becoming POTUS, one Richard M. Nixon, are more apparent every day. No one has ever run for the office longer or more obsessively than she and Nixon. And anyone who wants the presidency that badly should never, EVER have it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ouch !!! - 'The Clinton Campaign Puts The ‘Moron’ Into Oxymoron' - WaPo [View all]
WillyT
Sep 2015
OP
I've heard that parable. I'm not interested in being the fox that gets stung and drowns.
Bubzer
Sep 2015
#81
To be honest, the real reason for all the consultants and all the makeovers is
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#135
That's what a lot of people can't seem to get. It's ALL about the Issues. And on those issues
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#156
yes, who could possibly think "planned spontaneity" was ripe to be made fun of?
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2015
#13
Oh, I don't know. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, no one made fun of Professor McGonagle
PatrickforO
Sep 2015
#99
I can be objective and I think this is a pretty good observation of what's going on.
gateley
Sep 2015
#16
Biden "stands for women"? Really? After what he did to Anita Hill (and the women who came to
kath
Sep 2015
#143
It's the curse of too much money - it means too many consultants telling her what to do. And then
CanadaexPat
Sep 2015
#63
A President has lots of consultants and salaried advisors telling him or her what to do as well.
merrily
Sep 2015
#87
I hadn't noticed that, but now that you mention it, it's stupid (for anybody).
SusanCalvin
Sep 2015
#128
I agree there are some fair critiques of the campaign in this piece. It reminds me of 2008 when I
Metric System
Sep 2015
#157
At least no one's trying to imply she's racist like a lot of DUers have with Bernie.
cui bono
Sep 2015
#77
Dana Milbank. I just don't like this guy. He is such an opportunist. It's now OK to bash Hillary, so
thereismore
Sep 2015
#4
nothing in that article is inherently wrong. If it was she would be leading now. All she is
roguevalley
Sep 2015
#9
I dont agree that she has no poltical sense. I think others said it right...she needs to be herself.
Bubzer
Sep 2015
#84
She's "allowed" to be whatever she wants. All the final decisions about how she presents herself
merrily
Sep 2015
#89
Either way. Either we are seeing Hillary, or we are seeing someone who hires the wrong people
merrily
Sep 2015
#92
"with zero political sense" < That's not true. If this was 1990 she would be spot on. n/t
jtuck004
Sep 2015
#118
It is due to wanting something too much. Her desire to be president is more important than
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#24
HRC is like so many managers. They have to hear "That is the best idea I have ever heard" from
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#45
I have worked with managers like that, and no I did not being around when
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#133
In Hillary 8.0, she finally admits she is a Communist Tea Partier/Wobbly Bircher
LondonReign2
Sep 2015
#17
Her big-mouthed staff have created an "etch-a-sketch" meme for her. She needs to do some
tblue37
Sep 2015
#26
Yeah, good ole' Dana. Hey! Remember that time he purposely misquoted Obama in 2008?
wyldwolf
Sep 2015
#28
I am sure you know what an ad hominem attack is? Attack the messanger and ignore the message.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#55
I salute you. It's hard to argue against point that's borrowed from a Mad Libs tablet.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#73
She'll ditch the consultants as soon as she hears back from them if it's a good idea.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2015
#46
He voted for John McCain in 2000, Chuck Hagel in 2004, and Michael Bloomberg in 2008.
oberliner
Sep 2015
#62
Yeah, Dana Milbank has always been so objective regarding Hillary Clinton
One of the 99
Sep 2015
#124