Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ouch !!! - 'The Clinton Campaign Puts The ‘Moron’ Into Oxymoron' - WaPo [View all]gateley
(62,683 posts)66. You make a lot of good points. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ouch !!! - 'The Clinton Campaign Puts The ‘Moron’ Into Oxymoron' - WaPo [View all]
WillyT
Sep 2015
OP
I've heard that parable. I'm not interested in being the fox that gets stung and drowns.
Bubzer
Sep 2015
#81
To be honest, the real reason for all the consultants and all the makeovers is
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#135
That's what a lot of people can't seem to get. It's ALL about the Issues. And on those issues
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#156
yes, who could possibly think "planned spontaneity" was ripe to be made fun of?
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2015
#13
Oh, I don't know. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, no one made fun of Professor McGonagle
PatrickforO
Sep 2015
#99
I can be objective and I think this is a pretty good observation of what's going on.
gateley
Sep 2015
#16
Biden "stands for women"? Really? After what he did to Anita Hill (and the women who came to
kath
Sep 2015
#143
It's the curse of too much money - it means too many consultants telling her what to do. And then
CanadaexPat
Sep 2015
#63
A President has lots of consultants and salaried advisors telling him or her what to do as well.
merrily
Sep 2015
#87
I hadn't noticed that, but now that you mention it, it's stupid (for anybody).
SusanCalvin
Sep 2015
#128
I agree there are some fair critiques of the campaign in this piece. It reminds me of 2008 when I
Metric System
Sep 2015
#157
At least no one's trying to imply she's racist like a lot of DUers have with Bernie.
cui bono
Sep 2015
#77
Dana Milbank. I just don't like this guy. He is such an opportunist. It's now OK to bash Hillary, so
thereismore
Sep 2015
#4
nothing in that article is inherently wrong. If it was she would be leading now. All she is
roguevalley
Sep 2015
#9
I dont agree that she has no poltical sense. I think others said it right...she needs to be herself.
Bubzer
Sep 2015
#84
She's "allowed" to be whatever she wants. All the final decisions about how she presents herself
merrily
Sep 2015
#89
Either way. Either we are seeing Hillary, or we are seeing someone who hires the wrong people
merrily
Sep 2015
#92
"with zero political sense" < That's not true. If this was 1990 she would be spot on. n/t
jtuck004
Sep 2015
#118
It is due to wanting something too much. Her desire to be president is more important than
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#24
HRC is like so many managers. They have to hear "That is the best idea I have ever heard" from
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#45
I have worked with managers like that, and no I did not being around when
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#133
In Hillary 8.0, she finally admits she is a Communist Tea Partier/Wobbly Bircher
LondonReign2
Sep 2015
#17
Her big-mouthed staff have created an "etch-a-sketch" meme for her. She needs to do some
tblue37
Sep 2015
#26
Yeah, good ole' Dana. Hey! Remember that time he purposely misquoted Obama in 2008?
wyldwolf
Sep 2015
#28
I am sure you know what an ad hominem attack is? Attack the messanger and ignore the message.
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#55
I salute you. It's hard to argue against point that's borrowed from a Mad Libs tablet.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#73
She'll ditch the consultants as soon as she hears back from them if it's a good idea.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2015
#46
He voted for John McCain in 2000, Chuck Hagel in 2004, and Michael Bloomberg in 2008.
oberliner
Sep 2015
#62
Yeah, Dana Milbank has always been so objective regarding Hillary Clinton
One of the 99
Sep 2015
#124