Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does Hillary talk about .1% owning 90% of the wealth? About redistribution of wealth? [View all]Agschmid
(28,749 posts)96. I don't speak for "America"... Do you think you do?
Or even those links?
She has high unfavorables I'll give you that, but so does congress and we keep electing those folks. So does Trump and he is running away with the GOP nomination.
I'd also point out that nationally Clinton is still in the lead for the primary so we might not like her... But as of right now that doesn't seem to matter all that much.
If anything you might have had enough but some people seem to be ready for more, and they are entitled to that position... Even here on DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does Hillary talk about .1% owning 90% of the wealth? About redistribution of wealth? [View all]
Bonobo
Sep 2015
OP
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks - And Their Media And Political Party Minnions
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#1
More important than wealth inequality, is money in politics. That is the #1 issue, imo.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#19
And What Enabled Citizens United - Oligarchs Corporations And Banks - And Their Plans For Control
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#48
I think this question deserves more attention than counting black people. Am I wrong?? DU? Am I? nt
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#5
Nope. Phony distractions are more important that acknowledging a findamental problem
Armstead
Sep 2015
#65
The notion that Sandes is a racist, or doesn't give a shit about it is a phony distraction
Armstead
Sep 2015
#95
She "reportedly" made the statements behind closed door. LOL. Not quite the same thing.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#22
Because a politician talking behind closed doors is EXACTLY the same as putting them in a speech. nt
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#32
I wonder why it doesn't resonate... Perhaps it's that "authenticity" thing. I think so.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#47
Listen to his speeches - He says, quite clearly, that he doesn't want their money!
reformist2
Sep 2015
#70
Yeah, which would be limited in size, and would have no real effect on his total war chest.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#75
Hmmm, didn't hear anything about the .1 percent. Did I miss that? I mean those are her bankrollers.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#37
I'm just WORRIED that she doesn't seem to really care about the issue like Sanders clearly does.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#44
Am I missing the part where she actually suggests dong something concrete and effective about this?
Human101948
Sep 2015
#78
Just in case you want to talk about it, the figure for the top .1% is 22%
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2015
#57
Not sure why. I made no declarative statement in the OP subject line. It is a question.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#69
Yes, she does and YOU can do your own homework. There, I have set you straight as you
riversedge
Sep 2015
#76
Thank you DSC! I KNEW someone would have the class to come in here and bring racism into it!
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#79
". . . including trying to incite racial politics to divide people with common interests. "
Le Taz Hot
Sep 2015
#82
Might be a good question, "Are you and your biggest donators paying enough in taxes"
Babel_17
Sep 2015
#83
HRC is a tool of Wall Street and a bunch of petrofied Arab plutocrats - the top .01 percent
leveymg
Sep 2015
#101